share_log

Retail Investors Among Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited's (SGX:O39) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.4% Last Week

Retail Investors Among Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited's (SGX:O39) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 4.4% Last Week

新加坡交易所: OCBC Bank(SGX: O39)的零售投资者是其最大的股东之一,股价上周飙升4.4%后看到持股价值增长。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 00:51

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant control over Oversea-Chinese Banking by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 41% of the company
  • Institutions own 21% of Oversea-Chinese Banking
  • 散户投资者对华侨银行业务的严格控制意味着公众拥有更大的影响管理和治理相关决策的权力
  • 前25名股东拥有公司41%的股份
  • 机构拥有华侨银行业务21%的股份

Every investor in Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (SGX:O39) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 55% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

华侨银行有限公司(新加坡证券交易所股票代码:O39)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。持有55%的股份,散户投资者拥有该公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Clearly, retail investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by S$2.9b last week.

显然,在上周该公司的市值上涨了29亿新元之后,散户投资者受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Oversea-Chinese Banking.

在下图中,我们放大了华侨银行的不同所有权类别。

ownership-breakdown
SGX:O39 Ownership Breakdown July 5th 2024
新加坡交易所:O39 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 5 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Oversea-Chinese Banking?

关于海外中国银行业务,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构根据近似于当地市场的指数来衡量自己的表现。因此,他们通常会更多地关注主要指数中包含的公司。

Oversea-Chinese Banking already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Oversea-Chinese Banking's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

华侨银行已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到华侨银行的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SGX:O39 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
新加坡证券交易所:O39 收益和收入增长 2024 年 7 月 5 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Oversea-Chinese Banking. Selat (Pte) Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

对冲基金在华侨银行的股份不多。Selat(私人)有限公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的14%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约4.2%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有3.5%的所有权。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现25位大股东共同拥有的股份不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有不少分析师报道了该股,因此你可以很容易地研究预测的增长。

Insider Ownership Of Oversea-Chinese Banking

海外中国银行业的内部所有权

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终算在内。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own S$214m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据显示,内部人士拥有华侨银行有限公司不到1%的股份。但是,我们确实注意到,内部人士有可能通过私营公司或其他公司结构获得间接利益。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值2.14亿新元的股票(按当前价格计算)。可以说,最近的买入和卖出同样值得考虑。您可以点击此处查看内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 55% of Oversea-Chinese Banking shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

公众主要由个人投资者组成,共持有华侨银行55%的股份。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使权力,对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 23%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司拥有已发行股份的23%。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过单独的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Oversea-Chinese Banking better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Oversea-Chinese Banking you should know about.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解华侨银行业务,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了一个你应该知道的华侨银行警告信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发