share_log

Compass Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CMPX) Recent 32% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Compass Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CMPX) Recent 32% Pullback Adds to One-year Year Losses, Institutional Owners May Take Drastic Measures

Compass Therapeutics公司(纳斯达克代码:CMPX)最近下跌32%,导致一年内的亏损增加,机构持有者可能会采取激烈措施。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 07:38

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Compass Therapeutics' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 由于机构持有Compass Therapeutics很大的股份,所以该公司的股票价格可能容易受到他们的交易决定的影响。
  • 前八大股东持有该业务的51%。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CMPX) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Compass Therapeutics, Inc. (纳斯达克:CMPX) 的股东构成可以体现出哪一群体最有权势。持有该公司股票数量最多的群体,准确来说是52%的机构。换句话说,这一群体面临着最大的正面潜力或负面风险。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 32% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 74% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Compass Therapeutics, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上周,机构投资者看到其持有的股份总价值下降了32%。不用说,最近的损失,再加上一年中股东的74%的损失,可能会引起特定类型股东的不满,即“流动性提供者”或机构。机构或“流动性提供者”控制着大量资金,因此这些类型的投资者通常对股价的波动有很多影响。因此,如果下跌趋势继续,机构可能面临着出售Compass Therapeutics的压力,这可能对个体投资者产生负面影响。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Compass Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨Compass Therapeutics的每个所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:CMPX Ownership Breakdown July 5th 2024
纳斯达克: CMPX所有权结构分析2024年7月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Compass Therapeutics?

机构持股告诉我们有关Compass Therapeutics的什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Compass Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Compass Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Compass Therapeutics已经有机构股东。他们拥有公司中相当大的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉。然而,最好不要仅仅依赖于所谓的机构投资者提供的验证。他们也会犯错误。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试出售某个股票,那么往往会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查Compass Therapeutics以往的收益情况(如下所示)。当然,还要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:CMPX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
纳斯达克:CMPX2024年7月5日盈利和营业收入增长情况

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. It looks like hedge funds own 8.1% of Compass Therapeutics shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is OrbiMed Advisors LLC with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Thomas Schuetz directly holds 3.8% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有超过50%的公司股份,因此他们可能会在关键时刻强烈影响董事会决策。看起来对冲基金拥有Compass Therapeutics的8.1%股份。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值的创造(和较高的股价)。从我们的数据可以看出,OrbiMed Advisors LLC是最大的股东,持有16%的流通股。作为对比,第二大股东持有流通股的约8.1%,第三大股东持有公司流通股的5.7%。此外,该公司的首席执行官Thomas Schuetz直接持有公司总流通股的3.8%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

进一步调查发现,超过一半的Bentley Systems股份归前8位股东所有,这表明大股东和小股东的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Compass Therapeutics

Compass Therapeutics的内部人持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Compass Therapeutics, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$4.9m worth of stock in the US$113m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股东可能会有兴趣了解内部人是否持有Compass Therapeutics股份。内部人在自己的名字下持有的该美国11300万公司的股票总价值为US$490万。看到内部人有一些投资是好事,但我们通常希望看到更高的内部人持股。值得注意的是,也许可以检查一下这些内部人是否一直在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的普通公众拥有该公司19%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略他们。尽管这种所有权的大小可能不足以在其利益方面左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Equity Ownership

股权投资公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力参与塑造以价值创造为重点的公司策略。一些投资者可能会因此而受到鼓舞,因为股权投资公司有时可以鼓励市场看到公司的价值,从而采取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在将其上市后退出投资。

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

作为16%的股权,私人股权公司在以创造价值为重点的企业战略制定方面扮演着重要角色。有些人会喜欢这种情况,因为私人股权公司有时候是激进派,使管理层责任制水平更高。但还有些时候,私募股权公司则是在将公司上市后就卖掉。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Compass Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Compass Therapeutics (1 is concerning) that you should be aware of.

总是值得考虑不同持股群体所占股份。但要更好地了解Compass Therapeutics,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经确定了Compass Therapeutics 的 3个警示信号(1个令人担忧),您应该了解一下。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发