share_log

Is Hub Group (NASDAQ:HUBG) A Risky Investment?

Is Hub Group (NASDAQ:HUBG) A Risky Investment?

hub group(纳斯达克:HUBG)是否是一项风险投资?
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 14:37

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Hub Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HUBG) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

作为投资者,有些人认为波动性而不是债务是思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾经说过:“波动性远非风险的同义词。” 当你考虑一个公司的风险时,自然而然会考虑它的资产负债表,因为债务通常会在公司崩溃时是涉及的。我们可以看到Hub Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:HUBG)在业务中确实会使用债务。但是,这种债务会让股东感到担忧吗?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

为什么债务会带来风险?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

债务是帮助企业发展的工具,但如果一家企业无法偿还其债权人的债务,则将会处于其垂询之下。最糟糕的情况下,如果一家公司无法偿还其债权人,则可能破产。然而,更频繁(但仍然代价高昂)的情况是,一家公司必须以非常低的价格发行股份,永久性地稀释股东,以支持其资产负债表。但是,常见的情况是,一家公司合理地管理其债务,并将其用于自己的利益。当我们审查债务水平时,首先要考虑现金和债务水平。

How Much Debt Does Hub Group Carry?

Hub Group承担了多少债务?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Hub Group had US$334.8m in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it also had US$195.4m in cash, and so its net debt is US$139.4m.

下面的图表显示,Hub Group在2024年3月的债务金额为33480万美元,与去年大致相同。然而,它也拥有19540万美元的现金,因此其净债务为13940万美元。

big
NasdaqGS:HUBG Debt to Equity History July 11th 2024
纳斯达克:HUBG资产负债表历史记录2024年7月11日

How Healthy Is Hub Group's Balance Sheet?

Hub Group的资产负债表状况如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Hub Group had liabilities of US$648.6m due within a year, and liabilities of US$620.5m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$195.4m in cash and US$593.9m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$479.8m.

最新的资产负债表数据显示,Hub Group有64860万美元的1年内到期负债和62050万美元的到期负债。与此相抵,它有19540万美元的现金和59390万美元的应收账款,这些应收账款在12个月内到期。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款的总和47980万美元。

Given Hub Group has a market capitalization of US$2.57b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考虑到Hub Group的市值为2.57亿美元,很难相信这些负债会构成很大的威胁。话虽如此,很明显我们应该继续监测其资产负债表,以防发生不利的变化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

为了比较一个公司的债务与其收益的关系,我们计算其净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆盖率)。因此,我们考虑了债务的绝对数量以及支付的利率。

Hub Group's net debt is only 0.39 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 39.2 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. The modesty of its debt load may become crucial for Hub Group if management cannot prevent a repeat of the 60% cut to EBIT over the last year. When it comes to paying off debt, falling earnings are no more useful than sugary sodas are for your health. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Hub Group can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Hub Group的净债务仅为其EBITDA的0.39倍。而且它的EBIT轻松覆盖了利息支出,39.2倍于其利息支出。因此,我们对它极度保守地使用债务感到非常放心。如果管理层无法阻止过去一年EBIT下降60%的重蹈覆辙,那么它债务负担的适度程度可能会变得非常关键。在偿还债务方面,下降的收益对你的健康并没有任何用处。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表上了解债务情况。但最终,业务的未来盈利能力将决定Hub Group能否随着时间的推移巩固其资产负债表。因此,如果您关注未来,可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师的利润预测。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Hub Group produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 64% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最后,公司需要自由现金流来偿还债务;会计利润并不能解决问题。因此,我们始终会检查其中多少金额可以转化为自由现金流。在过去的三年中,Hub Group产生了强有力的自由现金流,相当于其EBIT的64%,与我们的预期相当。这种自由现金流使该公司在适当时可以处于良好的偿还债务地位。

Our View

我们的观点

Hub Group's EBIT growth rate was a real negative on this analysis, although the other factors we considered were considerably better. In particular, we are dazzled with its interest cover. Considering this range of data points, we think Hub Group is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Hub Group you should know about.

Hub Group的EBIT增长率对此分析而言是一个真正的负面因素,虽然我们考虑的其他因素要好得多。特别是,我们对其利息覆盖率印象深刻。考虑到这些数据点,我们认为Hub Group处于处理其债务水平的良好位置。但是要注意:我们认为债务水平已经高到有必要进行持续监测的程度。当你分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要关注的。但最终,每家公司都可能存在超出资产负债表范围的风险。恕我多言,但我们已经注意到了1个Hub Group的风险因素,你需要知道。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有这些工作之后,更感兴趣于拥有坚实资产负债表的快速发展公司,请立即查看我们的净现金成长股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发