share_log

Private Companies Are Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$120m Last Week

Private Companies Are Haw Par Corporation Limited's (SGX:H02) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by S$120m Last Week

私人企業是虎豹企業有限公司(新加坡交易所:H02)的最大股東,並在上週市值增加了1.2億新元后獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 19:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Haw Par by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 54% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Haw Par is 30%
  • 私人公司對虎豹企業的重要控制意味着公衆在管理和治理決策方面的影響力更大。
  • 前4大股東持有54%的業務。
  • 虎豹企業的機構持股比例爲30%。

Every investor in Haw Par Corporation Limited (SGX:H02) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 37% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

新加坡交易所(SGX:H02)的每個投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。擁有最大份額的是持有37%股權的私人公司。換句話說,這個團體從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大(或最多)的收益。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 5.4% gain.

因此,私人公司是上週5.4%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Haw Par, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討虎豹企業的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SGX:H02 Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
SGX:H02所有權拆分圖(截至2024年7月11日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Haw Par?

機構投資者在虎豹企業擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者在虎豹企業擁有一定的信譽,但我們不能單純依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌,因此值得關注虎豹企業下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才真正重要。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Haw Par. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Haw Par, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在虎豹企業中擁有相當多的股份。這可能表明,在投資社區中,該公司具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴機構投資者所做出的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,股價下跌也是常見現象。因此,最好檢查虎豹企業的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SGX:H02 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
SGX:H02盈利和營業收入增長圖(截至2024年7月11日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Haw Par. The company's largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd, with ownership of 28%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 9.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對虎豹企業沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,持有28%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有10%和9.8%的流通股。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Haw Par

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有虎豹企業的31%的股份。雖然這個群體不能必然左右公司的決策,但它確實對公司的經營產生了真正的影響。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that Haw Par Corporation Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own S$13m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,虎豹企業股份有限公司的內部人士擁有該公司不到1%的股份。然而,內部人員可能會通過更復雜的結構間接持有股權。這是一個大公司,因此即使是小比例的利益也可以在董事會和股東之間形成共識。在這種情況下,內部人員擁有價值1300萬新元的股份。看到至少有一些內部人員持股總是好的,但也值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Haw Par. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有31%股份的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對虎豹企業有一定的影響力。雖然這個團體不能決定行動方案,但肯定可以真正影響公司的經營方式。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 37%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的37%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得進一步調查誰擁有這些私人公司。有時,內部人員或其他相關方可能會通過單獨的私人公司擁有公衆公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Haw Par better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Haw Par (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

總是值得思考不同股東群體對公司股份的持有情況。但是,要更好地了解虎豹企業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了有關虎豹企業的2個警告信號(1個不能被忽視),您應該意識到這一點。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論