share_log

Returns At EPlus (NASDAQ:PLUS) Appear To Be Weighed Down

Returns At EPlus (NASDAQ:PLUS) Appear To Be Weighed Down

看起來納斯達克(NASDAQ)的正羽科技(EPlus)回報似乎受到了壓制。
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 08:37

If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. So, when we ran our eye over ePlus' (NASDAQ:PLUS) trend of ROCE, we liked what we saw.

如果你正在尋找翻倍人,有幾件事需要注意。首先,我們希望看到資本回報率(ROCE)在逐步增加,其次,資本使用規模逐漸擴大。基本上這意味着一個公司有利潤的計劃,可以繼續投資,這是一個複利機器的特徵。所以,當我們審視納斯達克上的正羽科技(NASDAQ:PLUS)的ROCE趨勢時,我們喜歡看到的是。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本僱用回報率(ROCE)是什麼?

If you haven't worked with ROCE before, it measures the 'return' (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for ePlus, this is the formula:

如果你以前沒有接觸過ROCE,那麼它是衡量公司在其業務中使用的資本的“回報”(稅前利潤)的指標。要爲正羽科技計算這個指標,請使用以下公式:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。

0.16 = US$160m ÷ (US$1.7b - US$657m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

0.16 = US$16000萬 ÷ (US$17億 - US$657m)(基於2024年3月的過去十二個月)。

So, ePlus has an ROCE of 16%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 10% generated by the Electronic industry.

因此,正羽科技的ROCE爲16%。單獨來看,這是一般的回報,但它比電子行業的10%好多了。

big
NasdaqGS:PLUS Return on Capital Employed July 12th 2024
納斯達克:PLUS的資本回報率回報2024年7月12日

In the above chart we have measured ePlus' prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for ePlus .

在上面的圖表中,我們已經衡量了正羽科技以往的ROCE與以前的表現,但未來可能更重要。如果您想查看分析師對正羽科技的預測,可以查看我們免費的分析師報告。

The Trend Of ROCE

當尋找下一個倍增器時,如果您不確定從哪裏開始,請關注幾個關鍵趨勢。首先,我們希望看到一個經過驗證的資本使用率。如果您看到這一點,通常意味着這是一家擁有出色業務模式和大量盈利再投資機會的公司。然而,調查蒙托克可再生能源公司(NASDAQ:MNTK)後,我們認爲它的現行趨勢不符合倍增器的模式。

While the current returns on capital are decent, they haven't changed much. The company has employed 118% more capital in the last five years, and the returns on that capital have remained stable at 16%. Since 16% is a moderate ROCE though, it's good to see a business can continue to reinvest at these decent rates of return. Over long periods of time, returns like these might not be too exciting, but with consistency they can pay off in terms of share price returns.

雖然目前的資本回報率還不錯,但並沒有太大變化。公司在過去五年中使用的資本增加了118%,而這些資本的回報率仍保持在16%。由於16%是一種中等的ROCE,因此看到一個企業可以以這樣的合理率繼續投資是好的。長期以來,這樣的回報可能不會太有吸引力,但是如果堅持下去,這些回報可以轉化爲股票回報。

In Conclusion...

最後,同等資本下回報率較低的趨勢通常不是我們關注創業板股票的最佳信號。由於這些發展進行良好,因此投資者不太可能表現友好。自五年前以來,該股下跌了32%。除非這些指標朝着更積極的軌跡轉變,否則我們將繼續尋找其他股票。

The main thing to remember is that ePlus has proven its ability to continually reinvest at respectable rates of return. On top of that, the stock has rewarded shareholders with a remarkable 106% return to those who've held over the last five years. So while investors seem to be recognizing these promising trends, we still believe the stock deserves further research.

要記住的主要是,正羽科技已經證明了其能夠以可觀的回報率不斷地進行投資。此外,持有股票的人在過去五年中已經獲得了驚人的106%回報率。所以儘管投資者似乎認識到這些有前途的趨勢,我們仍然認爲該股票值得進一步研究。

While ePlus doesn't shine too bright in this respect, it's still worth seeing if the company is trading at attractive prices. You can find that out with our FREE intrinsic value estimation for PLUS on our platform.

雖然正羽科技在這方面的表現不太出色,但它仍值得看看這家公司是否以有吸引力的價格交易。您可以在我們的平台上找到PLUS的免費內在價值估算。

If you want to search for solid companies with great earnings, check out this free list of companies with good balance sheets and impressive returns on equity.

如果您想尋找財務狀況良好、回報卓越的實力強企業,可以免費查看以下公司列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論