share_log

Is Topgolf Callaway Brands (NYSE:MODG) A Risky Investment?

Is Topgolf Callaway Brands (NYSE:MODG) A Risky Investment?

Topgolf Callaway品牌(紐交所:MODG)是否是一項風險投資?
Simply Wall St ·  07/12 11:08

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (NYSE:MODG) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

伯克希爾哈撒韋的查理·芒格支持的外部基金經理李璐毫不掩飾地表示:“最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失。”所以,當你考慮任何一隻股票的風險時,需要考慮債務的影響,因爲過多的債務可能會讓一家公司陷入困境。我們可以看到Topgolf Callaway Brands Corp. (NYSE:MODG)確實在業務中使用債務。但真正的問題在於,這種債務是否會讓公司變得更加風險。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

在企業遇到新資本或自由現金流狀況困難的情況下,負債會幫助企業。資本主義的必然過程是“創造性破壞”,銀行家會殘忍地清算失敗的企業。儘管這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到負債公司因貸方強迫其以低迷價格籌集資本而永久稀釋股東權益。當然,負債的好處在於通常代表了廉價資本,特別是當它替代具有高回報率再投資能力的公司的稀釋時。當我們檢查負債水平時,我們首先考慮現金和負債水平。

What Is Topgolf Callaway Brands's Net Debt?

Topgolf Callaway Brands的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Topgolf Callaway Brands had US$1.59b of debt in March 2024, down from US$1.66b, one year before. However, it also had US$240.2m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.35b.

你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但可以看到Topgolf Callaway Brands在2024年3月擁有15.9億美元的債務,比一年前的16.6億美元有所下降。但是,它還擁有240.2萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲13.5億美元。

big
NYSE:MODG Debt to Equity History July 12th 2024
NYSE:MODG債務資產比歷史記錄於2024年7月12日

How Strong Is Topgolf Callaway Brands' Balance Sheet?

Topgolf Callaway Brands的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Topgolf Callaway Brands had liabilities of US$875.0m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$4.33b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$240.2m and US$503.3m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.46b.

深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到Topgolf Callaway Brands在12個月內擁有8750萬美元的到期負債和433億美元的長期負債。另一方面,它擁有2402萬美元的現金和5033萬美元的應收款到一年。因此,它的負債超過了現金和(短期)應收款的總和446億美元。

This deficit casts a shadow over the US$2.56b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. After all, Topgolf Callaway Brands would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

這種赤字讓這家價值2560萬美元的公司籠罩在陰影之下,就像一個高聳的巨人。因此,我們肯定認爲股東需要密切觀察這一點。畢竟,如果Topgolf Callaway Brands今天不得不向其債權人付款,那麼它可能需要進行重大的再資本化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。

While Topgolf Callaway Brands's debt to EBITDA ratio (2.8) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.1, suggesting high leverage. It seems that the business incurs large depreciation and amortisation charges, so maybe its debt load is heavier than it would first appear, since EBITDA is arguably a generous measure of earnings. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. More concerning, Topgolf Callaway Brands saw its EBIT drop by 5.1% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues the company will face an uphill battle to pay off its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Topgolf Callaway Brands's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Topgolf Callaway Brands的債務/稅息折舊攤銷前利潤比率(2.8)表明其使用了一些債務,但其利息保障倍數非常薄弱,僅爲1.1,表明其有很高的槓桿率。似乎該企業會產生大量的折舊和攤銷費用,所以也許其負債負擔比起初看來更重,因爲EBITDA可能是收入的慷慨指標。因此,股東們應該明白,利息支出顯然最近對業務產生了影響。更讓人擔憂的是,在過去的十二個月中,Topgolf Callaway Brands的EBIT下降了5.1%。如果這種收益趨勢持續下去,該公司將面臨償還債務的艱鉅戰鬥。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的大部分信息。但是,未來的收益,比起任何其他因素,更能決定Topgolf Callaway Brands在未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果你想知道專業人士的看法,可能會發現分析師利潤預測這份免費報告很有意思。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Topgolf Callaway Brands burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

最後,公司只能用冷硬的現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務,因此我們清楚地需要看看EBIt是否導致了相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Topgolf Callaway Brands燒掉了大量的現金。雖然這可能是由於成長支出造成的,但它確實讓債務變得更加危險。

Our View

我們的觀點

To be frank both Topgolf Callaway Brands's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. Having said that, its ability handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, isn't such a worry. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Topgolf Callaway Brands has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Topgolf Callaway Brands is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

坦白地說,Topgolf Callaway Brands的EBIT轉自由現金流能力和其掌控總負債的記錄,讓我們對其債務水平感到不適。儘管如此,它根據其EBITDA處理債務的能力並不令人擔憂。考慮到所有上述因素,看起來Topgolf Callaway Brands的債務過多。這種風險對某些人來說很正常,但它當然不適合我們。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的大部分信息。但最終,每個公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。請注意,我們的投資分析中Topgolf Callaway Brands顯示了一個警告信號,你應該知道...

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時更容易關注那些甚至不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費查看零淨債務增長股票列表,立即獲得。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論