share_log

Argan, Inc.'s (NYSE:AGX) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.3% Over the Past Week

Argan, Inc.'s (NYSE:AGX) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.3% Over the Past Week

作爲Argan,Inc.的(NYSE:AGX)大型機構股東,股價在過去一週內持續上漲6.3%,一定會感到高興。
Simply Wall St ·  07/13 10:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Argan implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構對Argan的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

If you want to know who really controls Argan, Inc. (NYSE:AGX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想了解誰真正控制Argan,Inc.(NYSE: AGX),那麼您必須看看其股權登記簿的構成。機構持有82%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。換句話說,該機構將從其對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或丟失最多)的利益。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$965m in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 91%.

上週,機構投資者最終從公司市值達到9,650萬美元中受益最多。上週的收益還將進一步提高股東的一年回報,目前爲91%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Argan, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Argan的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:AGX Ownership Breakdown July 13th 2024
NYSE: AGX所有權分裂2024年7月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Argan?

機構所有權告訴我們Argan的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Argan. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Argan, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在Argan中佔有相當大的股份,表明專業投資者之間存在一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌也是常見的情況。因此,檢查Argan的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)是值得的。當然,還要記住其他因素要考慮。

big
NYSE:AGX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 13th 2024
NYSE: AGX收益和營業收入增長2024年7月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Argan. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 10%. With 7.7% and 5.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, River Road Asset Management, LLC and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此可以在董事會決策上發揮強大的影響力。我們注意到對Argan的對沖基金投資不重要。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,擁有10%的所有權。River Road Asset Management,LLC和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分別擁有7.7%和5.8%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以加深對股票預期表現的全面了解也是一個好習慣。雖然有部分分析師的覆蓋,但該公司可能沒有受到廣泛的關注。因此,在未來可能會受到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Argan

Argan的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Argan, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$965m, and insiders have US$53m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看出公司內部人員持有Argan,Inc的股份。市值僅有9,650萬美元,股東自有5,300萬美元的股份。看到內部人員有一些投資是好事,但有必要檢查是否有內部人員在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司中擁有12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略他們。雖然這種所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Argan .

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該知道Argan的一個警告標誌。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論