Private Companies Invested in Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603486) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥825m Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603486) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥825m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Ecovacs Robotics indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 57% ownership
- Insider ownership in Ecovacs Robotics is 27%
- 科沃斯機器人的私營公司佔有大量股權,表明它們在管理和業務策略方面具有更大的發言權。
- 該公司由2位投資者持有57%的股權。
- 科沃斯機器人的內部股份佔27%。
If you want to know who really controls Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603486), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着科沃斯機器人股份有限公司(上海證券交易所:603486),那麼你必須看看它的股份登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司43%的股權。換句話說,這個團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While insiders who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥24b last week,private companies took the most losses.
儘管內部股東所擁有的股權比例爲27%,但是在市值上週下跌至240億元后,私營公司遭受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ecovacs Robotics, beginning with the chart below.
接下來,我們將深入探討科沃斯機器人的每種所有者類型,首先是下面的圖表。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ecovacs Robotics?
機構所有權告訴我們關於科沃斯機器人的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Ecovacs Robotics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ecovacs Robotics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
科沃斯機器人已經有機構在股份登記簿上了。實際上,他們在公司中佔有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但與其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售某隻股票,大股價下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查科沃斯機器人的過去盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Ecovacs Robotics is not owned by hedge funds. Suzhou Chuangling Zhihui Investment Management Co., Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 42% of shares outstanding. With 14% and 10% of the shares outstanding respectively, Cheng Qian and Dongqi Qian are the second and third largest shareholders. Dongqi Qian, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. Furthermore, CEO Jianhua Zhuang is the owner of 1.9% of the company's shares.
科沃斯機器人沒有被對沖基金所有。蘇州創凌智慧投資管理有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有公司42%的股份。其中,程謙和錢東琦分別持有14%和10%的股份。錢東琦是第三大股東,還擔任董事長職務。此外,首席執行官莊建華擁有公司1.9%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Ecovacs Robotics
科沃斯機器人內部股份所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥24b, and insiders have CN¥6.7b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有科沃斯機器人股份有限公司的相當比例。它的市值只有240億元,內部人員自己名下持有67億元的股份。這是相當顯着的。很高興看到這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看內部人員最近是否在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 43%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的43%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人的身份擁有公共公司的股份來參與公共公司。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Ecovacs Robotics .
雖然考慮擁有的不同群體值得,但有其他更重要的因素。爲此,你應該注意我們發現的2個警告信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。