share_log

With 73% Ownership in Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 73% Ownership in Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

機構投資者在業務中佔有Community Financial System,Inc.(紐交所:CBU)73%的所有權,風險重重。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 08:26

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Community Financial System's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 考慮到機構持有社區金融系統股份的比例較大,他們的交易決策可能會對該公司的股價構成風險。
  • 前8大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 最近有內部人員購買。

A look at the shareholders of Community Financial System, Inc. (NYSE:CBU) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看社區金融系統股份有限公司(紐交所:CBU)的股東可以幫助我們了解哪個群體最有實力。 持有公司股份最多的群體,約佔公司股份的73%,是機構。 換言之,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 13% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 17% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

由於機構投資者的大股份,社區金融系統的股價在上週上漲13%後,他們獲得了最多的回報。 目前,該公司的一年回報率爲17%,上週的漲幅將會更加受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Community Financial System.

讓我們仔細觀察社區金融系統不同類型的股東,以了解更多信息。

big
NYSE:CBU Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
紐交所CBU所有權分佈格局:2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Community Financial System?

機構持股情況對社區金融系統有何影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Community Financial System does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Community Financial System's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到社區金融系統確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過分依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在他們參與的“擁擠交易”的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以查看社區金融系統的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總有更多方面。

big
NYSE:CBU Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
社區金融系統的紐交所CBU盈利和營業收入增長情況:2024年7月15日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Community Financial System is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 15%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以共同掌握相當大的權力。 社區金融系統不是由對沖基金持有的。 該公司的最大股東是黑石集團,擁有15%的股份。 爲了更好的理解,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有7.0%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Community Financial System

社區金融系統內部股權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Community Financial System, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$34m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,社區金融系統股份有限公司的內部人員擁有一些股份。 這家公司很大,所以看到這種水平的一致性是好的。 內部人員擁有價值3400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 看到內部人員的近期購買情況也是件好事。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響一項政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Community Financial System better, we need to consider many other factors.

思考公司股份所屬不同群體始終是值得的。但爲了更好地了解社區金融系統,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論