share_log

Following a 47% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO) Institutional Owners

Following a 47% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO) Institutional Owners

在去年下跌了47%後,最近的漲勢可能會讓納斯達克股票代碼爲LPRO的Open Lending Corporation(開放式貸款公司)的機構投資者感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 09:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Open Lending implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構對Open Lending的大量持股意味着他們對該公司股價有重要影響。
  • 共有7名投資者佔據該公司的52%所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in Open Lending Corporation (NASDAQ:LPRO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 62% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

納斯達克股票代碼爲LPRO的Open Lending Corporation每位投資者都應該了解最強有力的股東群體。 具體而言,持有公司股份最多的群體佔62%,即機構。 換句話說,該群體對他們的投資會獲得最大收益或最大損失。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 7.8% increase in the share price after a year of 47% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲7.8%,畢竟經歷了一年的47%下跌,這表明回報可能開始上升。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Open Lending.

在下面的圖表中,我們將焦點放在Open Lending的不同所有權群體上。

big
NasdaqGM:LPRO Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼爲LPRO的所有權結構於2024年7月15日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Open Lending?

機構持股告訴我們有關Open Lending的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Open Lending. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Open Lending's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Open Lending中持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅依賴這個事實,因爲像每個人一樣,機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下降。因此,值得觀察Open Lending以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:LPRO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼爲LPRO的Open Lending的收益和營業收入增長於2024年7月15日。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It looks like hedge funds own 6.3% of Open Lending shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wasatch Advisors LP with 14% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 7.9% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有該公司的一半以上股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。看起來對沖基金擁有Open Lending的6.3%股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能會非常活躍和積極。許多人正在尋找中期的催化劑,以推高股價。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Wasatch Advisors LP,持有14%的流通股。t. Rowe Price Group,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有9.0%的普通股,而The Vanguard Group,Inc.則持有公司股份的約7.9%。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步調查發現,前7大股東持有大約52%的股份登記證書,意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Open Lending

Open Lending的內部所有權。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Open Lending Corporation. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$40m worth of the US$705m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Open Lending Corporation的一些股份。作爲個體,內部人員共擁有該公司7,050萬美元的4,000萬美元。(原文有錯)這至少表明了一些對齊。您可以單擊此處以查看這些內部人員是否已購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in Open Lending. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Open Lending的20%股份。儘管這個群體不能決定命運,但可以在公司的運營方式上產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 6.3%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有6.3%的股權投資公司(PE公司)在塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面處於重要地位。有時,我們會看到PE公司長期留下,但總的來說,他們的投資週期較短,而且正如其名稱所示,不會在公開市場上投資太多。一段時間後,他們可以考慮出售並重新部署資本。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Open Lending has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如承擔風險 - 我們認爲Open Lending有1個警告標誌,您應該了解這個標誌。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論