share_log

TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 47% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 23%

TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF) Most Popular Amongst Retail Investors Who Own 47% of the Shares, Institutions Hold 23%

TeraWulf Inc.(納斯達克:WULF)是最受零售投資者歡迎的,他們擁有47%的股份,機構持有23%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 09:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over TeraWulf by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 散戶對特拉烏夫(TeraWulf)的顯著控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力去影響管理和治理決策。
  • 前25名股東持有48%的業務。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of TeraWulf Inc. (NASDAQ:WULF), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 47% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解特拉烏夫公司(納斯達克:WULF)究竟由誰控制,了解其所有權結構是很重要的。以47%股份,散戶擁有公司中的最大股份。換句話說,該群體將從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或輸掉最多)的利益。

Institutions, on the other hand, account for 23% of the company's stockholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

相反,機構持有公司23%的股東。大公司通常會有機構作爲股東,我們往往看到內部人持有更少的股票在較小的公司。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about TeraWulf.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於特拉烏夫的什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:WULF Ownership Breakdown July 15th 2024
納斯達克:WULF所有權結構細分2024年7月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TeraWulf?

機構所有權能告訴我們關於特拉烏夫的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that TeraWulf does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TeraWulf's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到特拉烏夫確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這說明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出不好的投資決策,與每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,你會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看特拉烏夫的下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正的重點。

big
NasdaqCM:WULF Earnings and Revenue Growth July 15th 2024
納斯達克:WULF收益和營業收入增長2024年7月15日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in TeraWulf. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In TeraWulf's case, its Top Key Executive, Nazar Khan, is the largest shareholder, holding 7.8% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Paul Prager is the owner of 2.9% of the company's shares.

對特拉烏夫來說,對沖基金持有的股份不多。因爲行動比言語更有說服力,當內部人持有大量股份時,這被視爲一個好跡象。在特拉烏夫的情況下,其高層管理人員Nazar Khan是最大的股東,持有公司已發行股份的7.8%。在這個背景下,第二大股東持有大約5.9%的已發行股份,第三大股東持有公司5.3%的股份。此外,CEO Paul Prager是公司股份的擁有者2.9%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of TeraWulf

特拉烏夫的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of TeraWulf Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$321m stake in this US$1.8b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來內部人擁有特拉烏夫股份的比例相當大。可以看到內部人在這家18億美元的公司中擁有價值3,210萬美元的有意義的股份是非常有趣的。能看到這種程度的投資是好事。你可以在這裏檢查一下是否有內部人最近有持股。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 47% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TeraWulf. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有47%的股份,由個人投資者主要組成的普通公衆對特拉烏夫有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 12%, of the TeraWulf stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看上去私人公司擁有特拉烏夫股票12%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方會通過單獨的私人公司擁有公開公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for TeraWulf (3 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我非常有興趣看看誰真正擁有一家公司。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了TeraWulf(3 個不應該被忽視的)4個警告標誌,您在此投資之前應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論