share_log

Here's Why Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

以下是爲何斯倫貝謝(紐交所:SLB)可以負責地管理其債務的原因。
Simply Wall St ·  07/15 14:08

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Schlumberger Limited (NYSE:SLB) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

傳奇基金經理李璐(得到查理·芒格的支持)曾經說過,“最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性的本金損失。”因此,當你考慮某個股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到,斯倫貝謝有限公司(紐交所:SLB)的業務中確實使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務創造了多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無力償還債權人,那麼就處於債權人的掌控之下。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。然而,更常見的情況(儘管仍然很昂貴)是企業必須以廉價股價稀釋股東的股份,才能控制債務。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮一家公司使用債務的情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的總體情況。

What Is Schlumberger's Net Debt?

什麼是斯倫貝謝的淨債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Schlumberger had US$12.3b of debt in March 2024, down from US$13.1b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$3.49b, its net debt is less, at about US$8.79b.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但是數據顯示斯倫貝謝在 2024 年 3 月擁有 123 億美元的債務,較一年前的 131 億美元有所下降。然而,由於其擁有 34.9 億美元的現金儲備,淨債務較少,約爲 87.9 億美元。

big
NYSE:SLB Debt to Equity History July 15th 2024
紐交所:SLb 債務與股本歷史記錄 2024 年 7 月 15 日

How Strong Is Schlumberger's Balance Sheet?

斯倫貝謝的資產負債表如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Schlumberger had liabilities of US$12.9b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$13.1b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$3.49b and US$8.22b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$14.2b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

當我們仔細查看最新的資產負債表數據時,我們可以發現斯倫貝謝有 129 億美元的負債在 12 個月內到期,131 億美元的負債超過 12 個月內到期。另一方面,它擁有 34.9 億美元的現金和 82.2 億美元的應收賬款,這些應收賬款在一年內到期。所以它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收款的總和多出 142 億美元。

Schlumberger has a very large market capitalization of US$66.3b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

斯倫貝謝的市值非常大,達到了 663 億美元,所以如果需要,它很可能籌集資金來改善其資產負債表。但我們一定要警惕其債務是否帶來了過多的風險。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

Schlumberger has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 1.2. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 15.1 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. And we also note warmly that Schlumberger grew its EBIT by 15% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Schlumberger's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

斯倫貝謝的淨債務與息稅前利潤(EBITDA)比率只有 1.2,利息費用容易被其 EBIt 輕鬆覆蓋,大小相差 15.1 倍。因此,你可以認爲它面臨的債務風險不比象徵着力大如象的老鼠的大象面臨的風險更大。我們也熱情地注意到,斯倫貝謝去年的 EBIt 增長了 15%,使其債務負載更容易處理。從資產負債表上,我們無疑可以了解到債務情況。但更重要的是,未來的收益將決定斯倫貝謝保持健康資產負債表的能力。如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份有關分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, Schlumberger produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 61% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤無法解決問題。因此,我們需要清楚地看到,這些 EBIt 是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,斯倫貝謝生產了堅實的自由現金流,相當於其 EBIt 的 61%,這正是我們所預期的。這些冷硬的現金意味着斯倫貝謝可以在需要時減輕其債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Schlumberger's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like Schlumberger is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Schlumberger you should know about.

令人欣喜的是,斯倫貝謝出色的利息保障倍數意味着其在債務方面擁有優勢。而好消息並非僅此,因爲它的 EBIt 增長率也支持這樣的印象!當我們考慮以上因素的範圍時,似乎斯倫貝謝在使用債務方面相當明智。儘管這帶來了一些風險,但它也可以增強股東的回報。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯位置。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險很難發現。每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了斯倫貝謝存在 3 個警告信號,你應該了解它們。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論