UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 3.7% Loss Over the Past Year
UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI) Institutional Owners May Be Pleased With Recent Gains After 3.7% Loss Over the Past Year
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies UGI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 顯著高的機構持股意味着UGI的股價對他們的交易行動非常敏感。
- 共有13個投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,持股比例爲50%。
- 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。
If you want to know who really controls UGI Corporation (NYSE:UGI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 84% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想了解UGI Corporation (紐交所:UGI)真正的控制者是誰,那麼你將不得不看一下其股份登記簿的構成。有着84%的股份,機構擁有公司中的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該組織將獲得最多的利益(或者如果出現下行將失去最多)。
Last week's US$249m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 3.7% losses.
上週美國24,900萬市值增長可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,尤其是在遭受3.7%損失之後的一年。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of UGI.
在下面的圖表中,我們會放大UGI不同的所有權組。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-85524ea9aa24892d45a4f5a7adf8bb35-0-5ca0dd89be262508744f84b1a214f8f8.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UGI?
機構持股對於UGI意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
UGI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at UGI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
UGI已經有機構在股份登記簿上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經查看了該股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,這隻股票價格可能會快速下跌。因此值得看一下UGI以下的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240716/0-85524ea9aa24892d45a4f5a7adf8bb35-1-5d51745c54a0efb132c5654b090f5f94.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in UGI. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 14% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 4.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有50%以上的公司股份,因此他們可以強烈影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對於UGI,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是黑石集團公司,擁有14%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的13%和4.9%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通過查看股東登記表,我們可以看到前13大股東控制了50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of UGI
UGI的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of UGI Corporation in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$17m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,持股人在自己的名字下持有的UGI Corporation持股不到1%。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員擁有公司的實際利益,而不必擁有很大比例的利益也是可能的。在這種情況下,他們擁有約1700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好的,但檢查一下那些內部持股者是否已經出售也是值得的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over UGI. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
佔據15%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對於UGI有一定的影響力。儘管擁有這麼多的所有權,如果決策不與其他大股東保持一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for UGI (1 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮到擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常有價值的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們在這裏投資之前發現UGI有2個警告信號(1個不應忽視!)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。