share_log

CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 11% Last Week

CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600084) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 11% Last Week

中信尼雅酒業有限公司(SHSE:600084)最大的股東是一些私營企業,在上週股價飆升11%後變得更富有了。
Simply Wall St ·  07/16 02:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in CITIC Niya Wine indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • 12% of CITIC Niya Wine is held by insiders
  • 中信尼雅酒業被私人企業廣泛持有,意味着它們共同對管理和業務策略有更大的發言權。
  • 公司前2名股東持有56%的股份
  • 中信尼雅酒業有12%的股份被內部人士持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600084), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解中信尼雅酒業股份有限公司(SHSE:600084)真正的控制者,了解公司的所有權結構十分重要。我們可以看到,私人企業擁有該公司47%的所有權。換句話說,這個集團會從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多的(或者失去最多的)。

Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥528m last week.

顯然,上週該公司的市值上漲52800萬人民幣後,私人企業獲益最多。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CITIC Niya Wine, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討中信尼雅酒業的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:600084 Ownership Breakdown July 16th 2024
SHSE:600084的所有權狀況於2024年7月16日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CITIC Niya Wine?

中信尼雅酒業缺乏機構股東對我們意味着什麼?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我們不會看到機構投資者持有非常高風險、交易較少或非常小的公司的股票。雖然有時會看到大公司沒有機構在註冊表上,但這並不是特別普遍的情況。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of CITIC Niya Wine, for yourself, below.

一個公司沒有機構股東可能有很多原因。如果流動性(每日交易的股票數量)很低,機構可能難以大量買入股票。如果公司沒有需要籌資,機構可能缺乏建立頭寸的機會。也有可能基金經理人沒有持有這種股票,因爲他們不相信它會表現良好。機構投資者可能不認爲該業務的歷史增長值得一提,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。下面你可以看到中信尼雅酒業的過去營業收入表現。

big
SHSE:600084 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 16th 2024
SHSE:600084的收益和營業收入增長於2024年7月16日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in CITIC Niya Wine. CITIC Guoan Group Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 45% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 1.8% of the stock.

對中信尼雅酒業而言,對沖基金的持股不多。中信國安集團股份有限公司是目前持有該公司45%流通股的最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有該公司約11%和1.8%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of CITIC Niya Wine

中信尼雅酒業的內部人士持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥641m worth of shares in the CN¥5.4b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有中信尼雅酒業股份相當大。內部人士持有這家市值54億人民幣公司的6410萬人民幣股份。我們認爲這顯示股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是創立了這家公司。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 41% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over CITIC Niya Wine. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

隨着41%的股份,普通公衆,大多由個人投資者組成,對中信尼雅酒業有一定的影響力。雖然他們不能稱霸大局,但他們確實對公司的運行產生了實質性的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 47%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私人企業擁有已發行股份中的47%。深入研究這個問題可能是值得的。如果相關方,如內部人士,對其中一個私人企業產生興趣,那麼這應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for CITIC Niya Wine (of which 1 shouldn't be ignored!) you should know about.

我發現了解一家公司實際上由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正得到洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現中信尼雅酒業的兩個警告信號(其中一個不應被忽視!),你應該了解一下。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論