share_log

FuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

FuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

FuboTV Inc.(纽交所:FUBO)股价上涨15%; 拥有56%股份的散户投资者与机构同样受益。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 08:39

Key Insights

主要见解

  • fuboTV's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 36% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 41% of fuboTV is held by Institutions
  • fuboTV的大量零售投资者持股表明关键决策受到来自更大公众的股东的影响。
  • 前25名股东持有36%的业务。
  • 机构持有fuboTV的41%。

Every investor in fuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

fuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。最大的股东群体是持有56%股权的零售投资者。换句话说,该群体从他们对公司的投资中获得或失去的最多。

Following a 15% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 41% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上周股价上涨15%,零售投资者获利最多,但持有41%股票的机构也从涨幅中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about fuboTV.

让我们更仔细地看一下不同类型的股东对fuboTV能带给我们什么信息。

big
NYSE:FUBO Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
纽交所:FUBO所有权分布2024年7月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About fuboTV?

机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in fuboTV. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see fuboTV's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在fuboTV中持有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者之间存在一些可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会犯错误的投资,就像每个人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,存在一种被称为“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方可能会争相快速抛售股票。在一家没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到fuboTV的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更复杂。

big
NYSE:FUBO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
纽交所:FUBO收益和营收增长2024年7月17日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in fuboTV. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.8% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 2.3% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO David Gandler is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.

对fuboTV来说,对冲基金没有太多的股份。我们的数据显示,BlackRock, Inc. 是持有流通股的最大股东,占7.8%。Vanguard Group, Inc. 是第二大股东,持有7.3%的普通股,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc. 持有该公司股票约2.3%。此外,首席执行官 David Gandler 拥有公司股份的0.9%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of fuboTV

fuboTV的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in fuboTV Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$8.6m worth of the US$399m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们可以报告内部人员在fuboTV Inc.中拥有股份。作为个人,内部人员共持有价值860万美元的这家39900万美元公司的股份。看到内部人员进行投资很好,但值得检查的是这些内部人员是否一直在购买。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 56% of fuboTV shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

大部分由个人投资者组成的公众共持有fuboTV股份的56%。拥有这么多股权,零售投资者可以共同对影响股东回报的决策发挥作用,例如分红政策和董事会任命。他们还可以行使投票权,对收购或合并进行投票,这些收购或合并可能无法提高盈利能力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand fuboTV better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for fuboTV that you should be aware of before investing here.

考虑拥有股份的不同群体总是值得思考的。但是,要更好地了解fuboTV,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,我们已经发现了fuboTV的3个警告信号,您在投资之前应该知道这些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发