Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SHBI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 19% Over the Past Week
Shore Bancshares, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:SHBI) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 19% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Shore Bancshares' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Insiders have bought recently
- 机构投资者持股比例显著高,说明Shore Bancshares的股价对他们的交易行动非常敏感。
- 总共有22个投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,拥有50%的所有权。
- 内部人士最近购买了股票。
Every investor in Shore Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:SHBI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
Shore Bancshares, Inc. (纳斯达克:SHBI)的每个投资者都应该了解最有力的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司45%的持股。换句话说,该组面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$73m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 14%.
上周该公司市值增加了7300万美元,机构投资者的情况正在好转。上周的收益将进一步提高股东的一年回报率,目前为14%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shore Bancshares.
让我们更近距离地观察一下Shore Bancshares的不同股东类型可以告诉我们什么。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240717/0-5599bc1b8a1e7f817115efa429b24a94-0-ae3301cc30408064cb88c1b978255cf6.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shore Bancshares?
机构持股告诉我们什么关于Shore Bancshares?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shore Bancshares. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shore Bancshares' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,机构投资者在Shore Bancshares中拥有相当大的股份。这表明其在专业投资者中享有一定的信誉。但仅仅依靠这一事实是不足以对该公司的投资进行可靠的评估的,因为机构有时会犯错误,就像每个人一样。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在着他们涉及的“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Shore Bancshares的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加复杂。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240717/0-5599bc1b8a1e7f817115efa429b24a94-1-e3e0f06637e38d5e668ecbe79ff48d66.png/big)
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 9.6% of Shore Bancshares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. The company's largest shareholder is Fourthstone LLC, with ownership of 9.6%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.9% and 5.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Alan Hyatt, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我们的数据显示,对冲基金拥有Shore Bancshares的9.6%。这很吸引人,因为对冲基金有时试图影响管理层或带来创造近期股东价值的变化。该公司最大的股东是Fourthstone LLC,持有9.6%的股权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有该公司已发行股份的8.9%和5.3%。而第三大股东Alan Hyatt还恰好担任董事会主席的职务。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 22 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更详细的所有权数字表明,前22名股东拥有50%的股权,这意味着没有单一的股东拥有占据优势的地位。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的推荐也是一个好礼。该股票受到的分析师覆盖范围很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空间获得更多的覆盖范围。
Insider Ownership Of Shore Bancshares
Shore Bancshares的内部股权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
We can see that insiders own shares in Shore Bancshares, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$39m worth of stock in the US$422m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以看到,Shore Bancshares, Inc.的内部人士持有股份。内部人士拥有价值3900万美元的股份在市值为42200万美元的公司中。有人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间存在共同利益。但值得注意的是,这些内部人士是否一直在出售这些股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shore Bancshares. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
拥有36%的股份,普通公众,大部分是个人投资者,对Shore Bancshares具有一定的影响力。尽管占据相当大的所有权,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能仍然无法改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Shore Bancshares has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我非常有兴趣看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司。但要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如风险- Shore Bancshares有3个警告信号,我们认为您应该知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。