share_log

Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN) Surges 21%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 36% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN) Surges 21%; Private Equity Firms Who Own 36% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

precigen公司(NASDAQ:PGEN)漲21% ;擁有36%股份的私人股權投資公司和機構也跟着獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 12:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Precigen by private equity firms implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Institutions own 30% of Precigen
  • 私募股權公司對Precigen的重要控制意味着,普通公衆更有權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
  • 前三大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 機構持有Precigen的30%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Precigen, Inc. (NASDAQ:PGEN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 36% to be precise, is private equity firms. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解Precigen, Inc. (納斯達克:PGEN)的實際掌控人,了解該公司的所有權結構是很重要的。持有公司最多股份的集團,約佔36%的是私募股權公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的收益(或者如果出現下滑,可能損失最多)。

Private equity firms gained the most after market cap touched US$415m last week, while institutions who own 30% also benefitted.

私募股權公司和持有30%的機構在市值上週達到41500萬美元后獲益最多。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Precigen.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對Precigen能告訴我們什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:PGEN Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
納斯達克:PGEN於2024年7月17日的所有權分佈。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Precigen?

機構投資者在Precigen中擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但是,由於機構有時會犯錯誤的投資決定,這個事實本身不足爲據。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總有一個風險,即它們在一個“擁擠貿易”中。如果這種交易失敗,多個方將可能競相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看下面Precigen的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住故事總是多方面的。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Precigen. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Precigen's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

納斯達克:PGEN於2024年7月17日的盈利和收入增長。

big
NasdaqGS:PGEN Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
Precigen不是由對沖基金持有。Third Security, LLC是目前公司的最大股東,持有36%的股票。其次和第三大股東分別是E. Merck KG和Patient Capital Management, LLC,持有流通股的8.2%和6.9%。此外,我們發現,首席執行官Helen Sabzevari擁有0.9%的股票。

Precigen is not owned by hedge funds. Third Security, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 36% of shares outstanding. With 8.2% and 6.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, E. Merck KG and Patient Capital Management, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. In addition, we found that Helen Sabzevari, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們可以看到公司內部人員擁有Precigen, Inc. (納斯達克:PGEN)的股份。市值僅爲4150萬美元,內部人員持有價值1600萬美元的股份。一些人可能會說這表明了股東和董事會之間的利益協調。但是,檢查這些內部人員是否有過出售可能是值得的。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Precigen

擁有36%股份的私募股權公司可能會影響Precigen的董事會。有些投資者可能對此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權公司有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。此外,這些持股人可能會在將其公開上市後退出該投資。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Precigen, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$415m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司股份的8.2%。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,例如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司有利益,應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般投資者--包括散戶--持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種擁有股份的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面促使政策決策的改變,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 36%, private equity firms could influence the Precigen board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

我覺得看公司的具體股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。因此,您應該了解我們發現的一項警告信號。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 8.2%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司股份的8.2%。這可能值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,例如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司有利益,應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Precigen .

我認爲查看誰確切地擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。因此,您應該了解我們發現的一項警告信號。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論