share_log

We Think Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

We Think Armstrong World Industries (NYSE:AWI) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt

我們認爲阿姆斯特朗工業(NYSE:AWI)可以控制其債務。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 14:03

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (NYSE:AWI) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」 當我們考慮一家公司的風險程度時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載會導致破產。我們注意到阿姆斯特朗工業公司(NYSE:AWI)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使該公司存在風險。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果一個企業無法償還債權人的債務,那麼它存在於債權人的掌控之下。資本主義的一個組成部分是「創造性破壞」過程,失敗的企業將無情地被銀行清算。然而,一種更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是,企業不得不以低價發行新的股權資本,從而永久地稀釋股東的權益。當然,很多公司使用債務來資助增長,而沒有任何負面後果。在考慮債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Armstrong World Industries's Debt?

阿姆斯特朗工業的債務情況是什麼?

As you can see below, Armstrong World Industries had US$582.3m of debt at March 2024, down from US$666.2m a year prior. However, it does have US$71.5m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$510.8m.

正如您下面所看到的,截至2024年3月,阿姆斯特朗工業的債務爲58230萬美元,較前一年的66620萬美元有所下降。但是,它擁有7150萬美元的現金來抵消這些債務,因此淨債務約爲51080萬美元。

big
NYSE:AWI Debt to Equity History July 17th 2024
NYSE:AWI債務股本比歷史記錄爲什麼? 2024年7月17日

A Look At Armstrong World Industries' Liabilities

看一下阿姆斯特朗工業的負債情況

The latest balance sheet data shows that Armstrong World Industries had liabilities of US$184.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$880.3m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$71.5m as well as receivables valued at US$125.8m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$867.4m.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,阿姆斯特朗工業在未來一年內需要償還的債務爲18440萬美元,未來需要償還的債務爲88030萬美元。抵消這些責任的是,它擁有7150萬美元的現金以及12580萬美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債比其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和多86740萬美元。

Given Armstrong World Industries has a market capitalization of US$5.16b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

考慮到阿姆斯特朗工業的市值爲5.16億美元,很難相信這些負債構成了多大的威脅。話雖如此,很明顯我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以防其惡化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

With net debt sitting at just 1.5 times EBITDA, Armstrong World Industries is arguably pretty conservatively geared. And this view is supported by the solid interest coverage, with EBIT coming in at 8.0 times the interest expense over the last year. Also good is that Armstrong World Industries grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Armstrong World Industries can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

阿姆斯特朗工業的淨債務/ EBITDA僅爲1.5倍,可謂相當保守的財務槓桿。此外,其利息覆蓋率良好,過去一年中EBIt爲利息支出的8.0倍。此外,阿姆斯特朗工業去年的EBIt增長了11%,進一步增加了管理債務的能力。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Armstrong World Industries recorded free cash flow worth 54% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決這個問題。因此,我們總是檢查每個EBIt產生了多少自由現金流。在過去的三年中,阿姆斯特朗工業記錄的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIt的54%,這在某種程度上是正常的,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅款。這種自由現金流讓公司有能力在適當時候償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

We feel that Armstrong World Industries's solid interest cover was really heart warming, like a mid-winter fair trade hot chocolate in a tasteful alpine chalet. And its apparent ability to to grow its EBIT is also rather rousing! All these things considered, it appears that Armstrong World Industries can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Armstrong World Industries you should be aware of.

我們認爲,阿姆斯特朗工業可靠的利息覆蓋率真是讓人感到溫暖,就像在時尚的阿爾卑斯山小屋裏喝一款公平貿易的熱巧克力。而其明顯的EBIt增長能力也相當激動人心!考慮到所有這些因素,阿姆斯特朗工業似乎可以輕鬆應對其目前的債務水平。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但還會帶來更大的風險,因此值得密切關注。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但從根本上講,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範疇的風險。事實證明:我們已經發現阿姆斯特朗工業的1個警示信號,您應該注意。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論