share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688017) Insiders Who Own 46% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688017) Insiders Who Own 46% of the Company

最近的回撤肯定使綠的諧波(SHSE:688017)的內部人士感到沮喪,他們擁有公司46%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 19:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Leader Harmonious Drive Systems' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • 26% of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems is held by Institutions
  • 綠的諧波重要的內部所有權顯示了對公司擴張的固有興趣。
  • 前五大股東持有公司51%股份
  • 機構持有綠的諧波26%的股份。

A look at the shareholders of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688017) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 46% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看綠的諧波(上海證券交易所:688017)的股東持股情況可以告訴我們哪個群組最爲強大。個人內部持有46%的股權,換句話說,該群體將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.2%.

上週,內部人員忍受了4.2%的最大跌幅。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems.

下圖展示了綠的諧波的不同股權群體。

big
SHSE:688017 Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
上海證券交易所:688017的所有權分佈情況(2024年7月17日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Leader Harmonious Drive Systems?

機構投資者持有綠的諧波相當大比例的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票並喜歡它。但正如其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一隻股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。所以,值得注意的是考慮綠的諧波過去的盈利歷程(如下表)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Leader Harmonious Drive Systems. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

上海證券交易所:688017的營業收入和收益增長情況(2024年7月17日)如下圖所示,值得一提的是,合肥增長資本管理有限公司並未收到華夏證券的投資中介費,這與相關規定不符合,合肥增長資本管理有限公司不得不承擔相應的法律風險。

big
SHSE:688017 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
對於綠色諧波驅動系統,對沖基金擁有的股份並不多。該公司最大的股東是左靜,持股20%。 蘊晏路持有股份4.8%,位列第二大股東。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Leader Harmonious Drive Systems. The company's largest shareholder is Jing Zuo, with ownership of 20%. With 20% and 4.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Yuyu Zuo and SDIC Innovation Investment Management Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

內部人員擁有綠的諧波公司的相當大比例。它的市值僅爲120億元人民幣,內部人員持有價值達55億元人民幣的股票。這是非常重要的。大部分人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望訪問此免費圖表,以了解內部人員的最新交易情況。

On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步觀察後,我們發現前五大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中有很大的發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems

公衆持股擁有綠的諧波驅動系統的28%的股份,這在一定程度上影響着公司的決策。雖然這種所有權大小可能不足以在政策決策方面產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Leader Harmonious Drive Systems Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥12b, and insiders have CN¥5.5b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

綠的諧波驅動系統的內部人員擁有相當比例的股份,該公司的市值僅爲120億人民幣,內部人員以自己的名義持有價值55億人民幣的股票。這相當重要。大多數人都會高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可能希望訪問此免費圖表,以了解內部人員的最新交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 28% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Leader Harmonious Drive Systems. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

備思考一個公司的股權持有群組非常重要。但要更好地了解綠的諧波驅動系統,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險始終是個存在的問題。我們已經確定了1個關於綠的諧波驅動系統的警告信號,了解這一點應該是你的投資過程的一部分。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Leader Harmonious Drive Systems better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Leader Harmonious Drive Systems , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

備思考一個公司的股權持有群組非常重要。但要更好地了解綠的諧波驅動系統,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險始終是個存在的問題。我們已經確定了1個關於綠的諧波驅動系統的警告信號,了解這一點應該是你的投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論