share_log

Following a 31% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Calavo Growers, Inc. (NASDAQ:CVGW) Institutional Owners

Following a 31% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Calavo Growers, Inc. (NASDAQ:CVGW) Institutional Owners

在去年下跌了31%之后,最近纳斯达克股票代码为CVGW的Calavo Growers公司受到机构投资者的好评。
Simply Wall St ·  07/18 11:31

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Calavo Growers' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鉴于机构持有该股的大量股份,Calavo Growers的股价可能容易受到其交易决策的影响
  • 共有9名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为50%
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

If you want to know who really controls Calavo Growers, Inc. (NASDAQ:CVGW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 81% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制了卡拉沃种植者公司(纳斯达克股票代码:CVGW),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。机构拥有81%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 16% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 31%.

机构投资者将对上周股价上涨16%表示赞赏,因为他们一年的亏损总额达到了令人失望的31%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Calavo Growers.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于卡拉沃种植者的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:CVGW Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CVGW 所有权明细 2024 年 7 月 18 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Calavo Growers?

关于Calavo Growers,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Calavo Growers already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Calavo Growers, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Calavo Growers已经在股票登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得检查一下Calavo Growers过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
NasdaqGS:CVGW Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
纳斯达克GS:CVGW 收益和收入增长 2024 年 7 月 18 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Calavo Growers is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 16% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Nuance Investments, LLC and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.8%. Additionally, the company's CEO Lecil Cole directly holds 2.9% of the total shares outstanding.

机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会对董事会的决策产生重大影响。Calavo Growers不归对冲基金所有。贝莱德公司目前是最大股东,已发行股份的16%。第二和第三大股东是Nuance Investments, LLC和The Vanguard Group, Inc.,其股数与其名义相等,为7.8%。此外,该公司首席执行官莱西尔·科尔直接持有已发行股份总额的2.9%。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9名股东占股票登记册的一半以上,少数规模较小的股东可以在一定程度上平衡大股东的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Calavo Growers

Calavo 种植者的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Calavo Growers, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$26m worth of stock in the US$422m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有Calavo Growers, Inc.的股份。内部人士以自己的名义拥有这家价值4.22亿美元的公司价值2600万美元的股票。这至少显示出一定的对齐性。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司13%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以影响对他们有利的政策决定,但它们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Calavo Growers is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。请注意,Calavo Growers在我们的投资分析中显示了1个警告信号,您应该知道...

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧吗?请直接联系我们。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?担心内容吗?直接联系我们。或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发