share_log

Digimarc Corporation's (NASDAQ:DMRC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.8% Over Last Week

Digimarc Corporation's (NASDAQ:DMRC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.8% Over Last Week

数字标识公司(纳斯达克股票代码:DMRC)的高机构持股比例证明了其自身价值,股票上周涨幅为9.8%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/18 15:30

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Digimarc's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 由于机构拥有Digimarc股份的很大比例,因此机构的交易决策可能会对Digimarc的股价产生影响。
  • 前五大股东持有该公司52%的股份。
  • 近期内有内部人士出售股票

Every investor in Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ:DMRC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 43% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每个Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ:DMRC)的投资者都应该知道最具有影响力的股东群体。机构拥有该公司的最大股份,占比43%。这意味着该群体在股价上涨时将获得最大收益(或在股价下跌时将损失最多)。

Last week's 9.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 12% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上周的9.8%涨幅意味着即使公司表现出强劲的长期趋势,机构投资者仍处于积极端。股东目前的一年回报率为12%,而上周的涨幅则是锦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Digimarc, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入挖掘Digimarc的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

big
NasdaqGS:DMRC Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
纳斯达克:DMRC所有权分析报告2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Digimarc?

机构所有权告诉我们有关Digimarc的什么信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

Digimarc already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Digimarc's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Digimarc已经有机构在持有其股票。实际上,它们在该公司拥有可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界拥有一定的信誉度。然而,最好还是谨慎地考虑依赖机构投资者所谓的证明。它们有时也会出错。当多个机构持有股票时,总是存在着他们参与的市场风险。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Digimarc的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,这只是故事的一部分。

big
NasdaqGS:DMRC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
纳斯达克:DMRC营收和收入增长分析报告2024年7月18日

It looks like hedge funds own 14% of Digimarc shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 18% stake, CEO Riley McCormack is the largest shareholder. With 14% and 10% of the shares outstanding respectively, Altai Capital Management, L.P. and Vincent Smith are the second and third largest shareholders.

看起来对冲基金拥有Digimarc股票的14%。这值得注意,因为对冲基金通常是相当活跃的投资者,他们可能会试图影响管理层。许多人希望在短期或中期内看到价值创造(和更高的股价)。 CEO Riley McCormack拥有18%的股份,是最大的股东。Altai Capital Management,L.P.和Vincent Smith分别持有股份的14%和10%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前5位股东控制了该公司超过一半的股份,这意味着该组人对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。虽然该公司有一些分析师关注,但它可能没有得到广泛关注。因此,它可能在未来得到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Digimarc

Digimarc内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Digimarc Corporation. Insiders have a US$223m stake in this US$734m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们最近的数据表明内部股东拥有Digimarc Corporation的一个相当比例的股份。内部股东在这家价值7,3400万美元的公司中持有2,2300万美元的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有很多股份。您可以点击此处查看他们是否一直在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投资者在内的公众持有公司的13%股权,因此不能被轻易忽略。尽管这种所有权规模可能不足以在他们有利时推动政策决策,但他们仍可以共同影响公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Digimarc has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我认为查看一个公司的所有者真正拥有公司很有趣。但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如风险——Digimarc有3个警戒信号,我们认为您应该注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发