share_log

Public Companies Are Lufax Holding Ltd's (NYSE:LU) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$115m

Public Companies Are Lufax Holding Ltd's (NYSE:LU) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped US$115m

公共公司是陆金所控股有限公司(纽交所:LU)最大的股东,市值下跌1.15亿美元后受到影响。
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 10:26

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by public companies in Lufax Holding indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 68% ownership
  • Institutions own 18% of Lufax Holding
  • 陆金所公共公司的持股数量相当大,这意味着它们在管理和业务策略上有更大的发言权。
  • 2名投资者持有公司的68%的所有权。
  • 机构持有陆金所18%的股权。

A look at the shareholders of Lufax Holding Ltd (NYSE:LU) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are public companies with 41% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

观察陆金所控股股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最为强大。占有41%所有权的公共公司是最大的股东。这意味着,如果该股票上涨(或在低迷期间失利),此集团将获得最大利益(或失去最多)。

And following last week's 6.8% decline in share price, public companies suffered the most losses.

在上周股价下跌6.8%后,公共公司遭受了最大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lufax Holding.

下面的图表展示了陆金所的不同股权集团。

big
NYSE:LU Ownership Breakdown July 19th 2024
纽交所陆金所股权结构于2024年7月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lufax Holding?

机构所有权对陆金所有什么影响?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Lufax Holding already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lufax Holding's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

陆金所已经有机构投资者在股权登记表上。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中拥有一定的信誉度。但是,最好不要过于依赖机构投资者所谓的认证。他们也有时会犯错。当多个机构持有一只股票时,总有一种可能性是他们在一场“拥挤的交易”中。当这样的交易出错时,多个方面可能竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以查看陆金所的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住故事背后总有更多的东西。

big
NYSE:LU Earnings and Revenue Growth July 19th 2024
纽交所陆金所收益和营收增长于2024年7月19日

Lufax Holding is not owned by hedge funds. Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 41% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 27% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

陆金所并不是由对冲基金持有的。中国平安保险(集团)股份有限公司是目前该公司最大的股东,持有41%的流通股。作为参考,第二大股东持有流通股的约27%,第三大股东则持有2.1%的股权。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 68% stake.

股东登记表的更详细研究显示,前两大股东通过持有该公司68%的股份拥有相当数量的所有权。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Lufax Holding

陆金所的内部持有情况

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

看起来,私营企业拥有安徽皖能电力股票的58%。这值得深入挖掘。如果相关方,如内部人士,在其中一家私营企业中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Lufax Holding. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是个体投资者的普通公众持有陆金所的14%的股份。虽然相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 27%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们的数据显示,私人公司持有该公司的27%股份。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过控股私人公司而不是以个人身份来拥有公共公司的利益。尽管很难得出任何广泛的结论,但值得注意作为进一步研究的领域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

We can see that public companies hold 41% of the Lufax Holding shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们可以看到公共公司持有陆金所已发行股份的41%。很难确定,但这表明他们有交织的商业利益。这可能是一个战略性的股份,因此值得关注该领域的股权变化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lufax Holding better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Lufax Holding .

在考虑拥有公司股份的不同集团时,了解陆金所还需要考虑许多其他因素。因此,您应该知道我们在陆金所发现的一个警告迹象。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发