share_log

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) After 3.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Individual Investors Invested in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) After 3.9% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

紐交所個人投資者在荷蘭兄弟公司(NYSE:BROS)投資的痛苦周,股價下跌3.9%,機構也遭受損失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 08:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Dutch Bros' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 28% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 荷蘭兄弟重要的個人投資者持有權表明決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 公司有25名投資者持有大部分股份,擁有28%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in Dutch Bros Inc. (NYSE:BROS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

持有荷蘭兄弟股份的每個投資者(NYSE:BROS)都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔有60%的所有權。換句話說,該群體的投資成本最高(或者最低)。

While institutions who own 37% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$6.8b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

當總市值上週降至68億美元時,機構持有人擁有37%的壓力,而個人投資者則損失最大。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Dutch Bros.

讓我們更加深入地了解不同類型的股東能夠告訴我們關於荷蘭兄弟的什麼。

big
NYSE:BROS Ownership Breakdown July 20th 2024
NYSE:BROS所有權拆分,截至2024年7月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Dutch Bros?

機構所有權對我們荷蘭兄弟有哪些啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Dutch Bros already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Dutch Bros' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

荷蘭兄弟在股權登記簿上已經有了機構。它們確實擁有公司的可觀股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。當多個機構持有一支股票時,它們總是有着一定的危險性。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方會競相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到荷蘭兄弟的歷史收益和營業收入如下,但請記住,這個故事總有更多的細節。

big
NYSE:BROS Earnings and Revenue Growth July 20th 2024
NYSE:BROS於2024年7月20日的盈利和營收增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Dutch Bros. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 3.6% of shares outstanding. Citadel Advisors LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 2.7% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 2.4% of the company stock.

我們注意到,對荷蘭兄弟的投資基金並沒有重要的投資。看看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是佔總股份的3.6%的The Vanguard Group,Inc。Citadel Advisors LLC是第二大股東,擁有2.7%的普通股,而FMR LLC擁有公司股票的約2.4%。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股情況是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以取得相同的結果。相當多的分析師涵蓋了這筆股票,所以你可以很容易地調查預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Dutch Bros

荷蘭兄弟內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Dutch Bros Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$192m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員持有荷蘭兄弟股票。它是一個相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要對齊是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約19200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在利益一致。儘管如此,還是值得檢查一下那些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 60% of Dutch Bros. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有荷蘭兄弟的60%股份。這種所有權規模爲來自普通公衆的投資者提供了一些集體權力。他們可以並且可能會影響執行薪酬、股息政策和提議的業務收購等決策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Dutch Bros that you should be aware of before investing here.

我非常有興趣看看到底是誰擁有一家公司。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了荷蘭兄弟的2個警告信號,你需要在這裏投資時要注意這些信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論