share_log

Painful Week for Private Companies Invested in China Coal Energy Company Limited (HKG:1898) After 3.8% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Companies Invested in China Coal Energy Company Limited (HKG:1898) After 3.8% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

中煤能源有限公司(HKG:1898)股价下跌3.8%,私营公司和机构也遭受损失,这是一个痛苦的一周。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 21:03

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by private companies in China Coal Energy indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Coal Group Co., Ltd)
  • Institutional ownership in China Coal Energy is 24%
  • 中煤能源由私营公司拥有大量股权,这意味着它们集体在管理和业务策略方面具有更大的影响力。
  • 该公司由单一股东(中国国家煤炭集团有限公司)持有58%。
  • 机构持有的中煤能源的股份占24%。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of China Coal Energy Company Limited (HKG:1898), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 59% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解中煤能源有限公司(HKG:1898)的实际控制者是谁,了解企业的所有权结构非常重要。私营公司占股比例达59%,拥有公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团面临的上行潜力(或下行风险)最大。

While institutions, who own 24% shares weren't spared from last week's HK$4.1b market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

虽然机构拥有24%的股份并没有幸免于上周41亿港元市值下跌,但私营公司作为一个整体遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Coal Energy.

让我们更近距离地观察一下不同类型的股东对中煤能源能够告诉我们什么。

big
SEHK:1898 Ownership Breakdown July 21st 2024
SEHK:1898 2024年7月21日的所有权结构分析。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Coal Energy?

机构持有权告诉我们有关中煤能源的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

China Coal Energy already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Coal Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

中国煤炭能源已经有机构参与股权登记。实际上,他们在公司中拥有一个称职的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师们已经研究了股票,他们喜欢它。但和其他人一样,他们可能是错误的。当多个机构拥有一家股票时,总会存在他们处于拥挤交易中的风险。当这样的交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。这种风险在没有成长历史的公司中更高。你可以看到中煤能源的历史盈利和营业收入,但要记住故事总是更多。

big
SEHK:1898 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 21st 2024
SEHK:1898 2024年7月21日的盈利和营业收入增长。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in China Coal Energy. The company's largest shareholder is China National Coal Group Co., Ltd, with ownership of 58%. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

我们注意到,对中煤能源没有实质性投资的对冲基金。该公司最大的股东是中国国家煤炭集团有限公司,持有58%的股权。这意味着他们在未来的公司控制权中拥有绝对的利益控制。作为背景,第二大股东持有约15%的流通股份,第三大股东持有2.5%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of China Coal Energy

中国煤炭能源的内部所有权。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我们注意到我们的数据并未显示任何董事会成员持有股票。董事会成员至少应该持有一些个人股份,这种情况很不寻常,因此我们的数据可能存在缺陷。一个很好的下一步是查看内部买卖的免费摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in China Coal Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通市民(通常是个人投资者)持有中煤能源18%的股份。虽然持有的大小相当可观,但如果决策不与其他大股东同步,这可能不足以改变公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 59%, of the China Coal Energy stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看起来,私营公司拥有中煤能源股份的59%。深入研究一下可能值得。如果相关方(如内部人士)对其中一家私营公司有利益,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私有公司也可能对公司具有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for China Coal Energy (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体很值得,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经为中国煤炭能源确定了2个警告标志(其中1个可能很严重),你应该注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发