With 87% Ownership of the Shares, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
With 87% Ownership of the Shares, Medtronic Plc (NYSE:MDT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Medtronic implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 23 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 机构在美敦力中拥有大量股份,意味着它们对公司的股价有重大影响力。
- 共有23个投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,占股50%。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Medtronic plc (NYSE:MDT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 87% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解Medtronic plc (纽交所MDT)真正的控制者,了解公司的所有权结构至关重要。机构占有最大股份,达到了87%。这意味着,如果股票上涨(或下跌),该集团将受益最大(或损失最大)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Medtronic.
让我们更近距离地观察一下不同类型的股东能告诉我们哪些关于Medtronic的信息。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240721/0-f04f79be96e55dd74e0d901efb0f463c-0-70fd76b852a061da622d132ce8a931b4.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Medtronic?
机构持有的股权告诉我们什么关于美敦力?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Medtronic. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Medtronic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
从上图可以看出,机构投资者在Medtronic中拥有相当大的股份。这表明有专业投资者的信誉。但是我们不能仅依赖这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出错误的投资,就像所有人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售某个股票,看到大幅股价下跌并不罕见。因此,值得查看Medtronic的过往收益趋势(如下图)。当然,还要记住其他需要考虑的因素。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240721/0-f04f79be96e55dd74e0d901efb0f463c-1-33b38f1f5406832ece6b5a8abdcf13e3.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Medtronic. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.9% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者拥有公司的超过50%的股份,因此它们可能能够强烈影响董事会的决策。我们注意到,对于Medtronic,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。该公司最大的股东是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,拥有9.8%的所有权。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有股份的8.9%和4.7%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
Sea股票内部持有情况 我们最新的数据表明,内部持有相当比例的Sea Limited的股份。内部人士持有价值65亿美元的这家价值430亿美元的公司。这是相当有意义的。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会正在与他们一起投资。您可能希望访问此处的免费图表,以显示内部人员的最近交易情况。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。
Insider Ownership Of Medtronic
美敦力的内部持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our information suggests that Medtronic plc insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$58m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我们的信息表明,Medtronic plc内部人士拥有不到1%的公司股份。它是一家非常大的公司,所以看到内部人士拥有公司较少比例的股份是很惊人的。尽管他们持有的股份不到1%,我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值5800万美元的股份(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员拥有股份是好事,但最好检查这些内部人员是否一直在购买。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Medtronic. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
个人投资者占有12%的股份,这些股份大多由个人投资者持有,他们对Medtronic有一定的影响力。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Medtronic better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Medtronic you should be aware of.
了解公司所有股东的不同群体总是值得思考的问题。但要更好地了解Medtronic,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。如下图所示:我们已经发现了2个Medtronic的警示信号,您应该知道这些信号。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。