share_log

Institutional Investors in Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI) Lost 14% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

納斯達克:Nova有限公司的機構投資者上週損失了14%,但受益於長期的創業板增長。
Simply Wall St ·  07/21 09:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Nova's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構對 Nova 股票的持有量較大,因此他們的交易決策可能會對 Nova 的股價產生影響。
  • 共有14名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,佔有50%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ:NVMI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正掌控了Nova有限公司的控制權(納斯達克股票代碼:NVMI),那麼您必須看一下該公司的股權登記簿組成。佔比最高的是機構,佔有79%的股份。 換句話說,該組織的投資在公司中可能賺得最多(或損失最多)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 14% in value last week. However, the 78% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東希望在投資中虧錢,尤其是看到他們的持股上週價值下跌14%的機構投資者。然而,78%的一年回報可能已經緩解了它們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Nova.

下圖是對 Nova 的不同所有權集團進行放大的分析。

big
NasdaqGS:NVMI Ownership Breakdown July 21st 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:NVMI 2024年7月21日的所有權結構分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Nova?

機構所有權告訴我們 Nova 的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Nova already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Nova's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Nova 已經被機構持有。他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者對公司的認可。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯,就像所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下下面的 Nova 盈利歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:NVMI Earnings and Revenue Growth July 21st 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:NVMI 2024年7月21日的盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Nova is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 10.0%. With 9.0% and 4.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wasatch Advisors LP and Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過股份發行量一半以上的股票,因此董事會可能會注意到他們的偏好。Nova 沒有被對沖基金所擁有。該公司最大的股東是 FMR LLC,股權佔比爲10.0%。 持有9.0%和4.4%的已發行股份,Wasatch Advisors LP 和 Menora Mivtachim Pensions & Gemel Ltd 分別是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前14名股東合計持有該公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Nova

Nova 的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員是否持有個人股份。董事會成員至少持有一些個人股份是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行動是檢查CEO的薪資。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Nova. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

佔有21%的普通公衆股東,大多由個人投資者組成,對 Nova 有一定的影響力。雖然這個群體不能決策,但它肯定能對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論