While Individual Investors Own 34% of Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Company Limited (SHSE:600004), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 57% Ownership
While Individual Investors Own 34% of Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Company Limited (SHSE:600004), Private Companies Are Its Largest Shareholders With 57% Ownership
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Guangdong Airport Management Group Limited)
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 民營公司對廣州白雲國際機場的重大控制意味着,普通公衆在管理和治理決策方面具有更多影響力。
- 該公司57%的股份由單一股東(廣東機場管理集團有限公司)持有。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Company Limited (SHSE:600004), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要想了解廣州白雲國際機場有哪些人真正掌控了公司,了解企業的所有權結構是非常重要的。我們可以看到,民營公司擁有公司的大部分股份,擁有57%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And individual investors on the other hand have a 34% ownership in the company.
另一方面,個體投資者持有該公司34%的股份。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於廣州白雲國際機場的什麼情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport?
機構的所有權告訴我們有關廣州白雲國際機場的什麼情況。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者持有廣州白雲國際機場相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽性。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於“擁擠的交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個機構可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到廣州白雲國際機場的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事背後總會有更多的東西。
Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport is not owned by hedge funds. Guangdong Airport Management Group Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. The second and third largest shareholders are Sinatay Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Investment Arm and abrdn plc, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 0.9%.
廣州白雲國際機場不是對沖基金的所有物。廣東機場管理集團有限公司是公司現有股份的最大股東,持有57%的股份。這基本上意味着他們在未來對公司具有廣泛的影響力,如果不是直接控制。第二和第三大股東分別是中信泰壽人壽保險股份有限公司和安聯標準人壽保險有限公司,他們的股份相等,佔0.9%。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport
廣州白雲國際機場的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
通常是個人投資者的普通公衆在江西國科防務集團有限公司中持有31%的股份。雖然這個團體不一定能夠控制公司,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆,包括零售投資者,持有該公司34%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這樣的持有量不足以左右政策決策方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 57%, of the Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看起來私營公司擁有廣州白雲國際機場的57%股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得探究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司擁有公共公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport .
想要了解廣州白雲國際機場,還需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該知道我們在廣州白雲國際機場發現的一個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。