share_log

Immunome, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IMNM) Institutional Investors Lost 6.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Immunome, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IMNM) Institutional Investors Lost 6.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Immunome公司(納斯達克:IMNM)的機構投資者上週虧損了6.0%,但從長期來看受益。
Simply Wall St ·  07/22 07:00

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Immunome implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構對Immunome的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
  • 52% 的業務由前 11 名股東持有
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

If you want to know who really controls Immunome, Inc. (NASDAQ:IMNM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Immunome, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:IMNM),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲52%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.0% in value last week. However, the 83% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中蒙受損失,尤其是上週持股價值下降6.0%的機構投資者。但是,83%的一年期回報率可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Immunome.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Immunome的什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:IMNM Ownership Breakdown July 22nd 2024
納斯達克CM:IMNM 所有權明細 2024 年 7 月 22 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Immunome?

關於免疫組,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Immunome. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Immunome's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在Immunome中擁有相當數量的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Immunome的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:IMNM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 22nd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:IMNM 收益和收入增長 2024 年 7 月 22 日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 15% of Immunome shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Redmile Group, LLC, with ownership of 8.2%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 6.5% of the stock. In addition, we found that Clay Siegall, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此它們可以共同行使巨大的權力。看來Immunome的15%的股票是由對沖基金控制的。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司的最大股東是Redmile集團有限責任公司,所有權爲8.2%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.6%和6.5%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官克萊·西格爾將0.7%的股份分配給了他們的名字。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記處,我們可以看到52%的所有權由前11名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Immunome

Immunome的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Immunome, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$35m worth of the US$798m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人士確實擁有Immunome, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有這家價值7.98億美元的公司價值3500萬美元。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Immunome. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Immunome19%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.5%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的9.5%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Immunome (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經在Immunome中發現了兩個警告信號(至少有一個很重要),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論