share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

帕克汉尼汾公司(纽交所股票代码:PH)拥有83%的股份,由机构投资者控制。
Simply Wall St ·  07/23 07:21

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Parker-Hannifin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 机构持有Parker-Hannifin的大量股份暗示着他们对公司股价有重大的影响力。
  • 共有25位投资者拥有这家公司48%的所有权。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

If you want to know who really controls Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH),那么你需要查看它的股份登记簿。机构拥有该公司的最大股份,达到83%。换句话说,该集团面临的上行潜力(或下行风险)最大。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由于机构股东拥有巨大的资源池和流动资金,他们的投资决策往往承载着很大的权重,特别是对个人投资者来说。因此,机构投入该公司的资金通常是对其未来的极大信心。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Parker-Hannifin, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入研究Parker-Hannifin的各类股东,从下面的图表开始。

big
NYSE:PH Ownership Breakdown July 23rd 2024
NYSE:PH所有权分布于2024年7月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Parker-Hannifin?

机构持股对Parker-Hannifin有什么影响?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Parker-Hannifin. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Parker-Hannifin's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在Parker-Hannifin中拥有相当数量的股票。这表明专业投资者之间有一定的信任度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像所有人一样。如果多个机构同时改变他们对一只股票的看法,你就会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看Parker-Hannifin下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:PH Earnings and Revenue Growth July 23rd 2024
NYSE:PH收益和营业收入的增长于2024年7月23日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Parker-Hannifin. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.2% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 4.2% of the stock.

投资者应该注意,机构实际拥有超过半数的公司股份,因此他们可以集体行使重大的权力。对于Parker-Hannifin而言,对冲基金持有的股票不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股东,持有8.2%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有约7.1%和4.2%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前25大股东共控制了公司股份的不到一半,这意味着公司的股份广泛分散,没有主导股东。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Parker-Hannifin

Parker-Hannifin的内部持股情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Parker-Hannifin Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$374m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人士持有Parker-Hannifin Corporation的股份不到1%。这是一家非常大的公司,因此如果看到内部人士拥有大量公司股份,这会让人感到惊讶。虽然他们持有的比例不到1%,我们可以看到,董事会成员共同拥有价值3,7400万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到董事会成员持有股份是一个好的信号,但是我们也值得检查这些内部人士是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Parker-Hannifin. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

占股16%的普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Parker-Hannifin有一定的影响力。虽然占股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Parker-Hannifin better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Parker-Hannifin has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考虑到不同的股东群体,总是值得思考一家公司的股权结构。但为了更好地了解Parker-Hannifin,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,风险- Parker-Hannifin有2个警示标志,我们认为你应该注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?对内容感到担忧?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发