share_log

A Quick Look at Today's Ratings for Alphabet Inc(GOOG.CA), With a Forecast Between $196 to $225

Moomoo News ·  Jul 23 21:00  · Ratings

On Jul 23, major Wall Street analysts update their ratings for $Alphabet Inc (GOOG.CA)$, with price targets ranging from $196 to $225.

BofA Securities analyst Justin Post maintains with a buy rating.

Evercore analyst Mark Mahaney maintains with a buy rating, and maintains the target price at $225.

Stifel analyst Mark Kelley maintains with a buy rating, and maintains the target price at $196.

KeyBanc analyst Justin Patterson maintains with a buy rating.

Here are the latest investment ratings and price targets for $Alphabet Inc (GOOG.CA)$ from 4 analysts:

StockTodayLatestRating_mm_85426912523802_20240723_en

Note:

TipRanks, an independent third party, provides analysis data from financial analysts and calculates the Average Returns and Success Rates of the analysts' recommendations. The information presented is not an investment recommendation and is intended for informational purposes only.

Success rate is the number of the analyst's successful ratings, divided by his/her total number of ratings over the past year. A successful rating is one based on if TipRanks' virtual portfolio earned a positive return from the stock. Total average return is the average rate of return that the TipRanks' virtual portfolio has earned over the past year. These portfolios are established based on the analyst's preliminary rating and are adjusted according to the changes in the rating.

TipRanks provides a ranking of each analyst up to 5 stars, which is representative of all recommendations from the analyst. An analyst's past performance is evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, with more stars indicating better performance. The star level is determined by his/her total success rate and average return.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement of any specific investment or investment strategy. Read more
    Write a comment