After the Recent Decline, Jenkem Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688356) CEO Xuan Zhao's Holdings Have Lost 11% of Their Value
After the Recent Decline, Jenkem Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688356) CEO Xuan Zhao's Holdings Have Lost 11% of Their Value
Key Insights
主要見解
- Jenkem Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 50% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- 13% of Jenkem Technology is held by Institutions
- Jenkem科技的大量內部持股表明了其對公司擴張的固有興趣。
- 前3大股東持有50%的業務。
- Jenkem科技的13%股份由機構持有。
A look at the shareholders of Jenkem Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688356) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 50% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看一下Jenkem科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688356)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力量。擁有50%股份的公司內部人員持有最多的股份。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to CN¥3.3b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着市值上週下跌至33億元,內部人員將面臨公司的任何其他股東團體中最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jenkem Technology.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Jenkem科技的什麼。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-c6cf7a6190ad5237424f7081df657179-0-ca77d1a0141c02dc3eb84b218f1dc75e.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jenkem Technology?
機構持股能告訴我們什麼關於Jenkem科技?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Jenkem Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Jenkem Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Jenkem科技在股份登記簿上已經有機構。事實上,他們持有公司的相當大一部分股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要警惕依賴機構投資者所供應的假定驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,那麼它的股價往往會大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Jenkem科技的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-c6cf7a6190ad5237424f7081df657179-1-e0c1ed6990a0b891a5481fb2a609ec5f.png/big)
Jenkem Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Xuan Zhao with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 10%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
Jenkem科技不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是總裁Xuan Zhao,持有25%的流通股。同時,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有流通股的15%和10%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 50% stake.
股東登記表的更詳細研究顯示,前3大股東通過其50%的股份擁有相當大的公司所有權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Jenkem Technology
Jenkem科技的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Jenkem Technology Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥3.3b, that means they have CN¥1.6b worth of shares. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人員擁有Jenkem科技超過一半的股份。這使他們有效地控制了公司。考慮到它的市值爲33億元人民幣,這意味着他們擁有16億元人民幣的股份。很高興看到這種投資水平。您可以在此處檢查這些內部人員最近是否有購買交易。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。這種所有權規模雖然很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.4%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據表明,私營公司持有該公司5.4%的股份。私營公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員可能通過持有私營公司的股份而非以個人身份擁有公共公司的股份。雖然很難得出任何全面的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Jenkem Technology you should be aware of.
我認爲看一下一個公司的真正股東是非常有趣的事情。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。事實證明:我們發現Jenkem科技有2個警告信號,您應該知道它們。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。