Does The Market Have A Low Tolerance For Arrow Home Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:001322) Mixed Fundamentals?
Does The Market Have A Low Tolerance For Arrow Home Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:001322) Mixed Fundamentals?
Arrow Home Group (SZSE:001322) has had a rough three months with its share price down 24%. It is possible that the markets have ignored the company's differing financials and decided to lean-in to the negative sentiment. Fundamentals usually dictate market outcomes so it makes sense to study the company's financials. In this article, we decided to focus on Arrow Home Group's ROE.
Arrow Home Group (SZSE:001322) 的股價在過去三個月中遭遇了24%的下跌。市場可能忽略了該公司的財務狀況,並決定繼續沉浸在負面情緒中。通常,基本面決定市場走勢,因此研究公司的財務狀況是有意義的。在本文中,我們決定重點關注 Arrow Home Group 的 ROE。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. Simply put, it is used to assess the profitability of a company in relation to its equity capital.
roe或股東權益回報率是評估公司如何有效地從股東那裏獲得回報的有用工具。簡而言之,它用於評估公司相對於其權益資本的盈利能力。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股東權益報酬率?
The formula for ROE is:
roe的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Arrow Home Group is:
因此,根據以上公式,Arrow Home Group 的 ROE 爲:
6.7% = CN¥330m ÷ CN¥4.9b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).
6.7% = CN¥33000萬 ÷ CN¥49億(基於截至2024年3月的過去12個月)。
The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every CN¥1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of CN¥0.07.
“回報”是過去十二個月的利潤。因此,這意味着對於每1元人民幣的股東投資,公司可以獲得0.07元人民幣的利潤。
Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth?
ROE對於盈利增長的重要性是什麼?
So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. Depending on how much of these profits the company reinvests or "retains", and how effectively it does so, we are then able to assess a company's earnings growth potential. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.
到目前爲止,我們已經了解到 ROE 是衡量公司盈利能力的指標。根據公司再投資或“保留”的這些利潤的數量以及其有效性,我們可以評估公司的盈利增長潛力。假設其他都相同,ROE 和利潤保留較高的公司通常具有更高的增長率,與那些沒有這些特點的公司相比。
Arrow Home Group's Earnings Growth And 6.7% ROE
Arrow Home Group 的盈利增長和6.7%的ROE
When you first look at it, Arrow Home Group's ROE doesn't look that attractive. However, given that the company's ROE is similar to the average industry ROE of 8.3%, we may spare it some thought. But then again, Arrow Home Group's five year net income shrunk at a rate of 8.5%. Remember, the company's ROE is a bit low to begin with. So that's what might be causing earnings growth to shrink.
當你首次看到時,Arrow Home Group 的 ROE 看起來並不那麼吸引人。然而,考慮到公司的 ROE 與行業平均 ROE 相似(8.3%),我們可以想想。但另一方面,Arrow Home Group 的五年淨利潤以8.5%的速度下降。請記住,該公司的 ROE 起點有點低,這可能導致收益增長收窄。
However, when we compared Arrow Home Group's growth with the industry we found that while the company's earnings have been shrinking, the industry has seen an earnings growth of 4.2% in the same period. This is quite worrisome.
但是,當我們將 Arrow Home Group 的增長與行業進行比較時,我們發現,儘管該公司的收益一直在下降,但該行業在同一時期內的收益增長率爲4.2%。這是非常令人擔憂的。
The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. The investor should try to establish if the expected growth or decline in earnings, whichever the case may be, is priced in. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Is Arrow Home Group fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.
爲公司附加價值的基礎在很大程度上與其盈利增長有關。投資者應該嘗試確定預期的盈利增長或下降是否已定價。通過這樣做,他們將知道該股票是否即將進入清澈的藍水,還是是否需要面對腐臭的泥潭。和其他公司相比,Arrow Home Group 是否被公平價值化?這3個估值指標可能會幫助您決定。
Is Arrow Home Group Making Efficient Use Of Its Profits?
Arrow Home Group 是否有效利用其利潤?
Looking at its three-year median payout ratio of 34% (or a retention ratio of 66%) which is pretty normal, Arrow Home Group's declining earnings is rather baffling as one would expect to see a fair bit of growth when a company is retaining a good portion of its profits. So there could be some other explanations in that regard. For instance, the company's business may be deteriorating.
看看其三年的平均派息比率爲34%(或留存比率爲66%),這是相當正常的。 Arrow Home Group 的盈利下滑相當令人困惑,因爲當公司保留大部分利潤時,人們期望看到相當多的增長。因此,可能會有一些其他解釋。例如,公司的業務可能在惡化。
In addition, Arrow Home Group only recently started paying a dividend so the management probably decided the shareholders prefer dividends even though earnings have been shrinking. Existing analyst estimates suggest that the company's future payout ratio is expected to drop to 25% over the next three years. The fact that the company's ROE is expected to rise to 10% over the same period is explained by the drop in the payout ratio.
此外,Arrow Home Group 只是最近開始支付股息,因此管理層可能決定股東更喜歡股息,儘管收益一直在下降。現有的分析師預測表明,公司未來的派息比率預計將在未來三年內降至25%。該公司的 ROE 預計在同期內上升到10%,這可以通過派息比率的下降來解釋。
Conclusion
結論
On the whole, we feel that the performance shown by Arrow Home Group can be open to many interpretations. While the company does have a high rate of reinvestment, the low ROE means that all that reinvestment is not reaping any benefit to its investors, and moreover, its having a negative impact on the earnings growth. With that said, we studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that while the company has shrunk its earnings in the past, analysts expect its earnings to grow in the future. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.
總體而言,我們認爲 Arrow Home Group 的表現可以有很多解釋。雖然該公司具有較高的再投資率,但低的 ROE 意味着所有這些再投資對其投資者並沒有任何好處,而且對盈利增長產生了負面影響。話雖這樣,我們研究了最新的分析師預測,發現儘管該公司過去曾收縮其盈利,但分析師預計其未來的盈利將增長。這些分析師的預期是基於行業的普遍預期,還是基於公司基本面?單擊此處以訪問我們的分析師預測頁面。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。