The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Kidswant Children Products Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301078) Insiders Who Own 33% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed Kidswant Children Products Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301078) Insiders Who Own 33% of the Company
Key Insights
主要见解
- Kidswant Children ProductsLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Kidswant Children ProductsLtd is 17%
- Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的重要内部所有权表明其在公司扩张方面存在固有的利益
- 总共有5位投资者拥有该公司的52%股权。
- Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的机构所有权为17%
Every investor in Kidswant Children Products Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301078) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 33% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
Kidswant儿童用品有限公司(SZSE:301078)的每一位投资者都应该了解最强势的股东群体。拥有最多股份的是个人内部人持有33%的股权。换句话说,该群体将从对公司的投资中获得最大的利益(或损失)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.8%.
上周内部人员遭受最大亏损,因为股票跌了6.8%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kidswant Children ProductsLtd.
在下面的图表中,我们放大了Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的不同所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kidswant Children ProductsLtd?
机构所有权告诉我们Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的什么?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
We can see that Kidswant Children ProductsLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Kidswant Children ProductsLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看出Kidswant儿童用品有限公司确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司股票的很大一部分。这可以表明公司在投资界具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好要谨慎依赖机构投资者所给予的假定认可。他们也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出股票,很常见会看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得注意的是,最好检查Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的过去收益轨迹(如下图)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。
Kidswant Children ProductsLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Jianguo Wang with 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 12% and 6.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
Kidswant儿童用品有限公司不是由对冲基金持有的。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是王建国,持有25%的流通股。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的12%和6.3%。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我们的研究还揭示了一个事实,即约52%的公司由前5名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。
Insider Ownership Of Kidswant Children ProductsLtd
Kidswant儿童用品有限公司的内部人持股情况
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少包括董事会成员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,经理们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见,尤其是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Kidswant Children Products Co.,Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.6b, and insiders have CN¥1.9b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我们的信息表明内部人员在Kidswant儿童用品有限公司中保持有重大持股。它的市值只有56亿,而内部人员拥有19亿的股份。看到内部人员如此投入业务是很好的。值得注意的是,最好检查这些内部人员最近是否一直在买入股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Kidswant Children ProductsLtd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
普通公众,通常是个人投资者,在Kidswant儿童用品有限公司持有28%的股份。尽管占据相当大的比例,但如果决策与其他大股东的决策不一致,则可能不足以改变公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有权
It seems that Private Companies own 20%, of the Kidswant Children ProductsLtd stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎私营企业拥有Kidswant儿童用品有限公司20%的股份。光从这个事实很难得出任何结论,因此,有必要调查拥有那些私营企业股份的人。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过单独的私营企业在公开公司持有股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Kidswant Children ProductsLtd you should be aware of.
我觉得查看一个公司的所有者真正是很有趣的。但是,要真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。例如:我们发现Kidswant儿童用品有限公司存在3个警告信号,您应该注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。