share_log

Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:000517) Stock Price Dropped 5.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:000517) Stock Price Dropped 5.2% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

榮安地產股價上週下跌了5.2%;私營企業可能會不滿意
Simply Wall St ·  07/25 20:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Rongan PropertyLtd's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 2 shareholders own 77% of the company
  • 29% of Rongan PropertyLtd is held by insiders
  • 榮安地產有着大量私人公司的股權,這意味着這些股東會對公司的重大決策產生影響。
  • 前兩名股東擁有該公司的77%股份
  • 榮安地產有着29%的內部股權持有者。

Every investor in Rongan Property Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:000517) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

作爲榮安地產股份有限公司(SZSE:000517)的投資者,你應該很清楚各位股東中最有力量的股東群體是誰。持有公司股份最多的群體,確切來說是48%的私人公司。也就是說,該群體將從其對公司的投資中獲得最多的利潤(或虧損得最多)。

While insiders who own 29% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥8.2b last week,private companies took the most losses.

儘管佔有29%的內部股權持有者在上週市值下降至82億元后承受了壓力,但私人公司的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rongan PropertyLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討榮安地產有限公司的每個所有者類型,首先看下面的圖表。

big
SZSE:000517 Ownership Breakdown July 26th 2024
SZSE:000517 2024年7月26日業主權益結構

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rongan PropertyLtd?

機構擁有者告訴我們關於榮安地產的什麼?機構只擁有榮安地產的一小部分股權,因此他們可能不會花費太多時間考慮公司。但很明顯,一些機構投資者已經花了相當多的時間進行研究,並且他們對公司很看好。如果公司的收益增長,那麼這可能表明它剛剛開始引起這些深財大戶投資者的注意。當多個機構投資者想要買入股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入歷史增長軌跡(如下圖所示)可以預示未來的增長,但沒有任何保證。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Since institutions own only a small portion of Rongan PropertyLtd, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.

由於機構只擁有榮安地產的一小部分股份,因此許多機構可能沒花費太多時間考慮該股票。但顯然,有些機構已經開始關注他們喜歡的股票了。如果公司的收益增長,那麼這可能表明它剛剛開始引起這些深財大戶投資者的注意。當多個機構投資者想要買入股票時,我們通常會看到股價上漲。過去的營業收入增長軌跡(如下圖所示)可以預示未來的增長,但沒有任何保證。

big
SZSE:000517 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 26th 2024
SZSE:000517 2024年7月26日盈利和收入增長

Rongan PropertyLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Rongan Group Holding Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 48% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 29% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

榮安地產未被對沖基金所擁有,目前的最大股東是榮安集團控股有限公司,他們佔有公司總股份的48%。作爲參考,第二大股東持有的股份數約爲29%,第三大股東持有1.0%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 77% stake.

股權登記簿的更詳細研究告訴我們,前兩大股東擁有相當數量的公司股份,他們持有77%的股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of Rongan PropertyLtd

榮安地產股份有限公司的內部股權持有者

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Rongan Property Co.,Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥2.4b stake in this CN¥8.2b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們的信息表明,內部人員在榮安地產股份有限公司擁有重要的股權。有趣的是,內部人員在這家82億元的公司中持有約2.4億元的股份。大多數人可能會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。你可以查看這個免費的圖表,以顯示內部人員的最近交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Rongan PropertyLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,持有榮安地產股份有限公司19%的股份。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以影響他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 48%, of the Rongan PropertyLtd stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私人公司擁有榮安地產股份有限公司48%的股份。很值得深入研究。如果關聯方,如內部人員,對其中一傢俬人公司有利益,那麼在年度報告中應該進行披露。私人公司可能還對該公司具有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Rongan PropertyLtd (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

深入了解公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲取見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現榮安地產股份有限公司有3個預警信號(其中1個無法忽略!)你在投資之前應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論