share_log

Sealand Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000750) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 49% Stake, While 37% Is Held by Private Companies

Sealand Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000750) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 49% Stake, While 37% Is Held by Private Companies

国海证券(SZSE:000750)的最大股东为零售投资者,持股比例达49%,而37%的股份由私营企业持有。
Simply Wall St ·  07/29 21:28

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Sealand Securities' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 国海证券的重要零售投资者持股表明,关键决策受到更大公众股东的影响。
  • 共有15名投资者拥有该公司的多数股份,拥有50%的所有权。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

Every investor in Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

深交所:000750的所有投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。 持有最大份额的群体是零售投资者,占比49%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,则该群体将受益最多(如果出现衰退,则损失最多)。

Meanwhile, private companies make up 37% of the company's shareholders.

同时,私人公司占公司股东的37%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sealand Securities.

在下图中,我们将放大介绍国海证券的不同股权代表。

big
SZSE:000750 Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
深交所000750所有权结构拆分 2024年7月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sealand Securities?

机构投资者持股情况给国海证券告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

Sealand Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sealand Securities, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

国海证券已经有股权机构了。确实,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这可能表明公司在投资社区中具有一定的信誉度。然而,最好还是警惕依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓认可。他们有时也会犯错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,则看到股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此值得检查国海证券的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然要记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

big
SZSE:000750 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
深交所000750营收增长 2024年7月30日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sealand Securities. The company's largest shareholder is Guangxi Investment Group Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 30%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

我们注意到,对国海证券的Hedge Fund并没有意义的投资。该公司最大的股东是广西产业投资集团有限公司,持有30%的股份。为了方便起见,第二大股东持有约4.4%的流通股,第三大股东持有3.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的股权拆分数据表明,前15大股东持有的股权总和为50%,这意味着没有任何单一股东拥有多数股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但还是研究分析师的建议,以深入了解股票预期表现,是一个好习惯。就我们所知,该公司没有分析师覆盖,因此可能没有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of Sealand Securities

国海证券的内部股权情况

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

内部人员的定义在不同国家之间可能略有不同,但董事会成员始终计数。公司管理层回答董事会,在此应代表股东利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员也在董事会上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

看起来,私营企业拥有安徽皖能电力股票的58%。这值得深入挖掘。如果相关方,如内部人士,在其中一家私营企业中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人企业也可能对公司有战略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

私人公司持有潍柴动力股票的比例为19%。可能值得更深入地研究这个问题。如果相关方,例如内部人,在其中一个私人公司中持有股份,则应在年度报告中披露。私人公司可能也对该公司具有战略利益。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Sealand Securities stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看起来私人公司拥有国海证券股票的37%。单凭这个事实很难得出什么结论,因此值得调查这些私人公司的所有者是谁。有时内部人员或其他相关方通过单独的私人公司在公共公司中持有股票。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

It appears to us that public companies own 7.1% of Sealand Securities. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我们认为公共公司占国海证券的7.1%。很难说是股份战略性持股,因此值得关注所有权的变化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Sealand Securities (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

检查一个公司的股东,我觉得这非常有趣。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们需要考虑其他信息。比如风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现了Sealand Securities的4个警告信号(其中1个令人关注!),您应该知道它们。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜欢核对具有潜在优越财务状况的其他公司,则不要错过此免费的备有强大财务数据支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发