Is Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) A Risky Investment?
Is Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) A Risky Investment?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
传奇基金经理李录(受查理·芒格支持)曾经说过:“最大的投资风险不是价格波动,而是是否会遭受资本永久损失。”当你考虑一家公司的风险时,考虑其资产负债表是再自然不过的了,因为当一家企业崩溃时通常会涉及到债务。重要的是,杜克能源公司(纽交所:DUK)确实承担了债务。但是这个债务会对股东产生影响吗?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什么时候负债才是一个问题?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
一般来说,只有当公司无法轻松地偿还债务(通过筹集资本或使用自有现金流)时,债务才会成为真正的问题。如果情况变得非常糟糕,贷方可以接管企业。然而,更常见的(但仍然很昂贵)情况是公司必须以便宜的股价稀释股东,以控制债务。当然,债务对于企业来说也可以是一个重要的工具,特别是资本投入高的企业。当我们考虑一家公司的债务使用情况时,我们首先关注现金和债务的总和。
How Much Debt Does Duke Energy Carry?
杜克能源承担了多少债务?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Duke Energy had US$81.4b of debt, an increase on US$76.2b, over one year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.
你可以点击下面的图表查看历史数据,但是可以看到截至2024年3月,杜克能源的债务总额为814亿美元,较去年增加了76.2亿美元。由于它没有太多现金,净债务大致相同。
How Healthy Is Duke Energy's Balance Sheet?
杜克能源的资产负债表看起来怎么样?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Duke Energy had liabilities of US$15.5b due within a year, and liabilities of US$112.5b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$459.0m as well as receivables valued at US$3.90b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$123.7b.
最新的资产负债表数据显示,杜克能源负有1.55亿美元的短期债务和1,125亿美元的长期债务。抵消这些义务的是,它拥有4.59亿美元的现金,以及12个月内到期的39亿美元的应收账款。因此,它的负债超过现金和(短期)应收款项的总和约123.7亿美元。
When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's huge US$83.9b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.
考虑到这个逆差超过了公司巨大的839亿美元的市值,你可能会倾向于密切关注杜克能源的资产负债表。在公司不得不迅速清理资产负债表的情况下,股东似乎很可能会遭受严重股权稀释。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
我们使用两个主要的比率来告诉我们相对于收益的债务水平。第一个是净债务除以利息、税、折旧和摊销前利润(EBITDA),而第二个是其利润前利息和税(EBIT)覆盖其利息费用的次数(或其利息覆盖率,简称)。因此,我们考虑与折旧和摊销费用相关的盈利以及没有相关费用的盈利相对于债务水平。
Weak interest cover of 2.4 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.9 hit our confidence in Duke Energy like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. On a slightly more positive note, Duke Energy grew its EBIT at 12% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Duke Energy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
2.4倍的弱利息覆盖率和5.9倍的恶劣净债务与息税折旧及摊销前利润比使我们对杜克能源的信心受到了致命的打击。这意味着我们认为它的债务负担很重。稍微乐观一点的是,过去一年中,杜克能源的息税折旧及摊销前利润增长了12%,进一步增强了它管理债务的能力。显然,在分析债务时,资产负债表显然是需要关注的领域。但最终,企业未来的盈利能力将决定杜克能源能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。所以,如果你关注未来,可以查看这份免费报告,显示分析师的利润预测。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Duke Energy saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最后,尽管税务部门可能非常喜欢会计利润,但债权人只接受现金。因此,合乎逻辑的做法是查看与实际自由现金流匹配的EBIt的比例。在过去的三年中,杜克能源出现了相当大的负自由现金流。虽然这可能是为了增长的开支,但它确实使得债务更加冒险。
Our View
我们的观点
On the face of it, Duke Energy's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at growing its EBIT; that's encouraging. It's also worth noting that Duke Energy is in the Electric Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Duke Energy has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Duke Energy you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.
从表面上看,杜克能源的净债务与息税折旧及摊销前利润让我们对股票充满疑虑,而它将EBIt转化为自由现金流的能力与最繁忙的一年中最空的餐厅的样子相同。但至少它的息税折旧及摊销前利润增长相当不错,这是令人鼓舞的。此外,值得注意的是,杜克能源处于公用事业行业,这通常被认为是相当具有防御性的。综合考虑所有上述因素,杜克能源看起来负债过多。尽管一些投资者喜欢这种风险较大的投资,但这肯定不是我们的菜。毫无疑问,我们从资产负债表中了解到负债方面的大部分内容。然而,并不是所有的投资风险都存在于资产负债表中,这是与资产负债表完全不同的。证据就是:我们发现杜克能源有3个警示信号,你应该意识到其中1个并有点担心。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
说到底,有时候更容易集中精力关注根本不需要债务的公司。读者可以免费访问零净债务增长股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。