share_log

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

在机构投资者中,爱默生电气公司(纽交所:EMR)是一个受欢迎的选择,他们持有76%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 11:57

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Emerson Electric's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构持股显著高表示艾默生电气的股价对其交易行为非常敏感。
  • 前25大股东占45%的业务。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想要知道真正控制纽交所上市公司艾默生电气股份的人,那么你需要查看其股份登记表的构成情况。持有该公司76%股份的是机构股东,该群体在股票上涨时最有可能受益(或在股票下跌时最有可能亏损)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考虑到机构持有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构持股往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者。因此,机构投资者投资公司的大量资金通常是对其未来的巨大信任。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Emerson Electric, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地了解艾默生电气的每一种所有者,从下图开始。

big
NYSE:EMR Ownership Breakdown July 31st 2024
2014年7月31日纽交所上市公司艾默生电气所有权分布情况。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?

机构持有是什么告诉我们关于艾默生电气的情况?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Emerson Electric does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我们可以看到艾默生电气回购了一部分公司股份,而且其股份中有相当一部分是由机构投资者持有的。这表明在专业投资者中艾默生电气具有一定的可信度。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为有时候机构和每个人一样也会做出错误的投资。如果多个机构同时改变对某支股票的看法,股价就可能会迅速下跌。因此,值得一提的是艾默生电气以下的收入历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:EMR Earnings and Revenue Growth July 31st 2024
2014年7月31日纽交所上市公司艾默生电气的收益率和营业收入增长情况。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Emerson Electric. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.1% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者持有公司的50%以上股份,因此他们可能能够强烈影响公司董事会的决策。对于艾默生电气而言,对冲基金的持股量不多。我们的数据显示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是该公司最大的股东,持有该公司9.1%的流通股。值得一提的是,第二大股东持有约6.2%的流通股,而第三大股东持有4.2%的流通股。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更深入的研究表明,前25名股东的持股总额不到注册表的一半,表明有一个小股东的大群体,其中没有单个股东拥有多数股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric

艾默生电气的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$252m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的信息表明,艾默生电气公司内部人员持有该公司不到1%的股份。由于其体量如此大,我们不希望内部人员持有大量的股份。研究显示,他们共持有25200万美元的股份。董事会成员拥有股份是一件好事,但最好检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Emerson Electric. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众持有艾默生电气23%的股份,他们通常是个体投资者。尽管这个群体不能决策,但他们可以在公司的运营方面发挥真正的影响力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Emerson Electric that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑到拥有某家公司的不同群体很重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经发现艾默生电气有1个警告信号,你应该知道这一点。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发