Here's What's Concerning About NanJi E-Commerce's (SZSE:002127) Returns On Capital
Here's What's Concerning About NanJi E-Commerce's (SZSE:002127) Returns On Capital
Finding a business that has the potential to grow substantially is not easy, but it is possible if we look at a few key financial metrics. Firstly, we'll want to see a proven return on capital employed (ROCE) that is increasing, and secondly, an expanding base of capital employed. This shows us that it's a compounding machine, able to continually reinvest its earnings back into the business and generate higher returns. However, after investigating NanJi E-Commerce (SZSE:002127), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.
寻找有潜力大幅增长的企业并不容易,但如果我们关注一些关键的财务指标,还是可能的。首先,我们想要看到净资本回报率(ROCE)已经证明了不断增长,其次是资本投入正在不断扩张。这表明这是一个复利机器,能够持续地将收益再投资到业务中,并产生更高的回报。然而,在调查了南极电商(深圳证券交易所股票代码:002127)之后,我们认为它目前的趋势并不符合多倍收益的特征。
Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?
资本雇用回报率(ROCE)是什么?
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on NanJi E-Commerce is:
对于那些不了解ROCE的人,其衡量标准是公司每年税前利润(其回报)与业务所用资本相对比。在南极电商上进行此类计算的公式是:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
资产雇用回报率(ROCE)是指企业利润,即企业税前利润除以企业投入的总资本(负债加股权)。如果ROCE高于企业财务成本的承受能力,那么企业就会创造出更多的价值。
0.016 = CN¥74m ÷ (CN¥5.4b - CN¥762m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).
0.016 = 7,400万人民币 ÷ (54亿人民币 - 762万人民币)(基于截至2024年3月的滚动12个月)。
Thus, NanJi E-Commerce has an ROCE of 1.6%. Ultimately, that's a low return and it under-performs the Media industry average of 4.0%.
因此,南极电商的ROCE为1.6%。最终,这是一个低回报率,低于媒体行业的平均水平4.0%。
While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you're interested in investigating NanJi E-Commerce's past further, check out this free graph covering NanJi E-Commerce's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
虽然过去并不代表未来,但了解一家公司历史表现情况可能会有所帮助,这就是我们为什么有上面的图表。如果你对进一步调查南极电商的历史情况感兴趣,可以查看这个免费图表,涵盖南极电商过去的盈利、营收和现金流。
How Are Returns Trending?
综合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其资本利用率所产生的回报。考虑到股票过去五年保持稳定,如果其他指标也不错,则可能存在机会。因此,进一步研究这家公司并确定这些趋势是否会持续是合理的。
In terms of NanJi E-Commerce's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. To be more specific, ROCE has fallen from 24% over the last five years. However it looks like NanJi E-Commerce might be reinvesting for long term growth because while capital employed has increased, the company's sales haven't changed much in the last 12 months. It's worth keeping an eye on the company's earnings from here on to see if these investments do end up contributing to the bottom line.
就南极电商的历史ROCE走势而言,这一趋势并不理想。具体而言,ROCE在过去五年中已从24%下降。然而,看起来南极电商可能正在为长期增长进行再投资,因为虽然资本投入已增加,但公司的销售额在过去12个月中并没有太大变化。从现在开始,关注公司的收益是否从中受益,这值得一提。
In Conclusion...
最后,同等资本下回报率较低的趋势通常不是我们关注创业板股票的最佳信号。由于这些发展进行良好,因此投资者不太可能表现友好。自五年前以来,该股下跌了32%。除非这些指标朝着更积极的轨迹转变,否则我们将继续寻找其他股票。
To conclude, we've found that NanJi E-Commerce is reinvesting in the business, but returns have been falling. Moreover, since the stock has crumbled 70% over the last five years, it appears investors are expecting the worst. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.
总之,我们发现南极电商正在为业务进行再投资,但回报正在下降。此外,由于该股票在过去五年中下跌了70%,投资者似乎预期最坏情况。总的来说,内在趋势不符合多倍收益的典型特征,因此如果你想要取得更好的效果,我们认为你可能会在其他地方更有运气。
If you'd like to know about the risks facing NanJi E-Commerce, we've discovered 2 warning signs that you should be aware of.
如果您想了解南极电商面临的风险,我们已经发现了2个警示信号,您应该了解一下。
While NanJi E-Commerce may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
虽然南极电商目前可能没有获得最高回报,但我们已经编制了一份可获得超过25%净资产收益率的公司清单。在此处查看此免费清单。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。