share_log

Wuxi Boton Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300031) Market Cap up CN¥515m Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Insiders

Wuxi Boton Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300031) Market Cap up CN¥515m Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Insiders

寶通科技的市值上漲51500萬人民幣上週,使得持有58%股份的零售投資者和內部人員都受益。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 22:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Wuxi Boton Technology's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 40% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Insiders own 22% of Wuxi Boton Technology
  • 寶通科技的重要零售投資者持有表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前25位股東持有40%的業務。
  • 內部人持有寶通科技22%的股份。

Every investor in Wuxi Boton Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300031) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

寶通科技股份有限公司(SZSE:300031)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東集團。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有58%的股權,是公司的最大股東。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大的利潤(如果出現下跌,則損失最大)。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥6.7b last week, while insiders who own 22% also benefitted.

上週市值達到67億人民幣後,零售投資者獲得了最多的利益,同時持有22%股份的內部人也獲益。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Wuxi Boton Technology.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了對寶通科技不同股東組的所有權分佈的觀察。

big
SZSE:300031 Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
SZSE:300031所有權拆分2024年8月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wuxi Boton Technology?

機構投資者擁有寶通科技的信息可以告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Wuxi Boton Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Wuxi Boton Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,寶通科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明該公司在投資界有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某種股票,很常見會導致大股價下跌。因此,值得檢查寶通科技的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:300031 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
SZSE:300031收益和營業收入增長情況2024年8月1日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Wuxi Boton Technology. The company's CEO Zhifang Bao is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.9% and 1.6% of the stock.

我們注意到,對於寶通科技,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。公司的首席執行官寶誌芳是持有20%流通股的最大股東。與之相比,第二大和第三大股東持有約1.9%和1.6%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Wuxi Boton Technology

寶通科技的內部人持有情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Wuxi Boton Technology Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.5b worth of shares in the CN¥6.7b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

似乎內部人持有寶通科技股份的比例相當大。內部人持有價值15億元人民幣的股份,佔該公司67億元股份的一部分。看到內部人如此投入業務是很好的,也值得檢查一下這些內部人最近是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Wuxi Boton Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

一般公衆,通常是散戶,持有寶通科技58%的股份,表明它是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。由於持有這麼多股份,零售投資者可以在影響股東回報的決策方面發揮集體作用,如分紅政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使關於可能無助於提高盈利能力的收購或合併投票權。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Wuxi Boton Technology you should know about.

雖然值得考慮公司的不同所有權組,但還有更重要的因素。請考慮最多風險。每個公司都有這些風險,我們發現寶通科技有一個警告標誌,您應該知道。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論