share_log

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Inly Media Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603598) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.5b

Insiders Were the Key Beneficiaries as Inly Media Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603598) Market Cap Rises to CN¥3.5b

隨着引力傳媒股份有限公司(SHSE:603598)的市值上升至35億元人民幣,內部人成爲了主要受益者
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 02:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Inly Media's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 內部人似乎對引力傳媒的增長有着切實的利益,這可以從他們的大量股權持有來看。
  • 前3大股東持有50%的業務。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

If you want to know who really controls Inly Media Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603598), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道真正控制引力傳媒股份有限公司(SHSE:603598)的人,那麼您就必須查看其股權登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,個人內部人員擁有該公司的絕大部分股權,持股比例達43%。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.

因此,內部人士是上週14%收益最大的受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Inly Media, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究引力傳媒的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SHSE:603598 Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
SHSE:603598所有權構成2024年8月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Inly Media?

機構持股告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Inly Media does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Inly Media, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,引力傳媒確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中享有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像其他人一樣犯錯誤。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一支股票,股價大幅下跌就很常見。因此,值得檢查下面的引力傳媒過去的收益軌跡。當然,還要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

big
SHSE:603598 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
SHSE:603598收入和營業收入增長2024年8月1日

Inly Media is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Yan Ji Luo with 37% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

引力傳媒沒有被對沖基金所持有。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是羅彥吉,持有37%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的7.5%和5.6%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

南京證券複合材料公司內部所有權情況

Insider Ownership Of Inly Media

內部人持有引力傳媒的股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Inly Media Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.5b worth of shares in the CN¥3.5b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人在引力傳媒股份有限公司中擁有重要股權。內部人在總市值爲35億的公司中擁有價值15億元人民幣的股票。這可能表明創始人仍擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Inly Media. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個體投資者,在引力傳媒中持有42%的股份。雖然這種持股規模可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 7.5%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有本公司7.5%的股份。單憑這個事實難以得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司持有上市公司的股權。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Inly Media has 3 warning signs (and 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) we think you should know about.

雖然考慮不同的公司所有者群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如風險 - 引力傳媒有3個警告標誌(以及1個我們認爲不太好的標誌),我們認爲您應該知道。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論