share_log

Insiders of Levi Strauss & Co. (NYSE:LEVI) Were Rewarded After Last Week's 5.5% Gain

Insiders of Levi Strauss & Co. (NYSE:LEVI) Were Rewarded After Last Week's 5.5% Gain

上周莱维斯特劳斯股份有限公司(纽交所:LEVI)股票上涨5.5%,内部人士获得了回报。
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 11:57

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Levi Strauss' growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 7 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent purchases by insiders
  • 内部人士似乎对李维斯的增长有着既得利益,这可以从他们拥有的大量股权中看出。
  • 前7大股东拥有该公司的51%。
  • 最近有内部人员购买。

A look at the shareholders of Levi Strauss & Co. (NYSE:LEVI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 56% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看李维斯公司(纽交所:LEVI)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最强大。个别内部人士持有公司的最大股份,占56%。换句话说,该群体从他们对公司的投资中最有可能获得最大的收益(或蒙受最大的损失)。

Our data shows that insiders recently bought shares in the company and they were rewarded after market cap rose US$382m last week.

据我们的数据显示,内部人士最近购买了该公司的股票,上周市值增加了38200万美元。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Levi Strauss.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了李维斯的不同所有权群体。

big
NYSE:LEVI Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
纽交所:LEVI所有权分布图2024年8月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Levi Strauss?

机构的持股情况告诉我们有哪些机构是李维斯的重要持股者。李维斯已经有机构在股东名册上了。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这股票并喜欢。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变了他们对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此值得看一下李维斯下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Levi Strauss already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Levi Strauss' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

李维斯已经有机构在股东名册上了。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这股票并喜欢。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变了他们对一支股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此值得看一下李维斯下面的收益历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:LEVI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
纽交所:LEVI收益和营业收入增长2024年8月1日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Levi Strauss. Miriam Haas is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.3% and 8.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

对于李维斯来说,对冲基金并不持有太多股票。米里亚姆·哈斯(Miriam Haas)是目前持有公司11%流通股的最大股东。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的9.3%和8.8%。

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的挖掘,发现前7名股东持有大约51%的股份,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Levi Strauss

李维斯的内部人士持有超过一半的股份。这使他们有效地控制了公司。内部人士在这家73亿美元的公司中持有40亿美元的股份。这是非同寻常的!大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起投资。你可能希望了解他们是否一直在购买或出售。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Levi Strauss & Co.. This gives them effective control of the company. Insiders own US$4.0b worth of shares in the US$7.3b company. That's extraordinary! Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to discover if they have been buying or selling.

普通公众,通常是个人投资者,持有李维斯15%的股份。虽然这种所有权规模可能不足以左右政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Levi Strauss. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

始终值得考虑不同的持股群体。但要更好地了解李维斯,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。案例的关键在于:我们已经发现了三个李维斯的警告信号,你应该知道。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Levi Strauss better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Levi Strauss you should be aware of.

始终值得考虑不同的持股群体。但要更好地了解李维斯,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。案例的关键在于:我们已经发现了三个李维斯的警告信号,你应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发