share_log

Private Companies Are Huadian Power International Corporation Limited's (HKG:1071) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b

Private Companies Are Huadian Power International Corporation Limited's (HKG:1071) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b

私营企业是华电国际有限公司(HKG:1071)的最大股东,在市值下降29亿港元后受到冲击。
Simply Wall St ·  08/02 18:39

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Huadian Power International by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in Huadian Power International is 17%
  • 私人公司对华电国际电力的重大控制意味着公众有更多的权力影响管理和治理决策。
  • 总共有2个投资者掌握了该公司52%的所有权。
  • 华电国际电力的机构持股比例为17%。

A look at the shareholders of Huadian Power International Corporation Limited (HKG:1071) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看华电国际电力股份有限公司(HKG:1071)的股东,我们可以知道哪个群体最有力量。我们可以看到私人公司拥有该公司54%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面临了最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

As market cap fell to HK$58b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

由于市值上周下跌至580亿港元,私人公司将比该公司的其他股东面临更高的亏损风险。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Huadian Power International.

让我们更加深入地了解一下不同类型的股东对华电国际电力的影响。

big
SEHK:1071 Ownership Breakdown August 2nd 2024
SEHK:1071所有权细分于2024年8月2日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Huadian Power International?

机构持股的信息告诉我们关于华电国际电力的信息

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

We can see that Huadian Power International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Huadian Power International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到华电国际电力确实具有机构投资者,他们持有公司的一部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经审视了该股票,他们喜欢它。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能是错的。当多家机构持有一种股票时,存在它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这样的交易失败时,多个方面可能竞相快速抛售股票。这种风险在一家没有增长历史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到华电国际电力的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,故事的背后总会有更多。

big
SEHK:1071 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 2nd 2024
SEHK:1071盈利和营业收入的增长于2024年8月2日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Huadian Power International. Our data shows that China Huadian Corporation Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们注意到对华电国际电力的对冲基金没有实质性的投资。我们的数据显示,中国华电有限公司是最大的股东,持有45%的流通股。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的6.5%和2.7%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前2名股东拥有该公司的大部分所有权,这意味着他们足够强大,可以影响公司的决策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Huadian Power International

华电国际电力的内部持股量

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人员的精确定义可能具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。管理层最终向董事会负责。然而,如果经理是创始人或CEO,那么他们成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.

我们注意到我们的数据没有显示任何董事会成员持有股票。在董事会中看到这么低的个人持股水平是很少见的(我们的数据可能不完整)。关注投资者应查看此处以查看内部人是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Huadian Power International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常,个人投资者的持股比例为29%,虽然该持股比例相当可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步则不足以改变公司的政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司54%的股份,这值得更加深入地探究。如果相关方,例如内部人士,在其中一家私人公司中拥有利益,那么应该在年度报告中披露。私人公司也可能对公司有战略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Huadian Power International you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.

对公司的真正洞察力需要考虑其他信息。例子是:我们已经发现华电国际电力有2个警告,您应该了解其中一个,而另一个则有点不愉快。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析师在未来增长方面的预测,请务必不要错过这份免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有任何反馈?对内容有任何疑虑?请直接与我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发