share_log

Pamica Technology Corporation's (SZSE:001359) Market Cap Rose CN¥462m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 44% Profited and so Did Insiders

Pamica Technology Corporation's (SZSE:001359) Market Cap Rose CN¥462m Last Week; Private Companies Who Hold 44% Profited and so Did Insiders

上週,帕米卡科技股份有限公司(SZSE:001359)的市值增加了人民幣46200萬;持有44%股份的私人公司以及內部人員都獲得了收益。
Simply Wall St ·  08/02 19:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Pamica Technology by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The top 2 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insider ownership in Pamica Technology is 30%
  • 私人公司對 Pamica Technology 有重大控制權意味着一般公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關決策。
  • 公司前兩名股東共持有該公司51%的股份。
  • Pamica Technology 內部持股比例爲 30%。

Every investor in Pamica Technology Corporation (SZSE:001359) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每個投資 Pamica Technology Corporation(SZSE:001359)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東集團。擁有最大股份的是持有 44% 股權的私人公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最多利益(或在股市下跌時損失最多)。

Following a 12% increase in the stock price last week, private companies profited the most, but insiders who own 30% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲了 12%,私人公司獲得了最大的利潤,但持有 30% 股份的內部股東也從上漲中獲得了利益。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pamica Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究 Pamica Technology 的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
SZSE:001359 Ownership Breakdown August 2nd 2024
SZSE:001359 所有權結構(2024 年 8 月 2 日):

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pamica Technology?

機構投資者沒有持有 Pamica Technology 股票,這說明了什麼?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Pamica Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司可能沒有任何機構投資者出現在股東名冊上,原因有很多。如果流動性(每天交易的股份數量)較低,機構投資者可能難以大量購買股份。如果公司沒有需要籌集資本的需求,則機構投資者可能缺乏構建頭寸的機會。或者,可能由於公司的某些因素,機構投資者遠離該公司。Pamica Technology 的盈利和營收記錄(如下圖)可能對機構投資者不具有吸引力,或者他們可能沒有仔細研究這家企業。

big
SZSE:001359 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 2nd 2024
SZSE:001359 盈利和營收增長(2024 年 8 月 2 日):

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pamica Technology. The company's largest shareholder is Hubei Zhonghui Industrial Co., Ltd., with ownership of 40%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 11% and 10% of the stock. Dujiang Pan, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.

我們注意到,對 Pamica Technology 沒有任何有意義的對沖基金投資。該公司最大的股東是湖北中滙實業有限公司,持股比例爲 40%。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約 11% 和 10% 的股份。佔第三大股東的潘都江還兼任副主席。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。

Insider Ownership Of Pamica Technology

Pamica Technology 內部持股:

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Pamica Technology Corporation. Insiders have a CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥4.2b business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

看來內部人員擁有 Pamica Technology Corporation 的相當比例的股份。內部人員在這家 42 億元企業中持有 13 億元的利益。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否已經買進或賣出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有公司的26%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這樣的所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益中影響一項政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到私人公司持有的已發行股份爲44%。很難僅從這個事實中得出任何結論,因此了解誰擁有這些私人公司也很值得。有時內部人員或其他關聯方通過一個獨立的私人公司擁有上市公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Pamica Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

我認爲查看一家公司的所有者是非常有趣的事情。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們在此處發現了 Pamica Technology 的 1 個警告標誌,您在進行投資之前應該了解這些信息。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論