share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore Insteel Industries, Inc.'s (NYSE:IIIN) Recent US$50m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore Insteel Industries, Inc.'s (NYSE:IIIN) Recent US$50m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

機構投資者可能會忽略紐交所IIIN最近5000萬美元的市值下滑,因爲長期利潤仍然保持在良好狀態。
Simply Wall St ·  08/03 08:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Insteel Industries' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 9 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 顯著高的機構持股表明Insteel Industries的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前9大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 通過公司過去的業績數據和股權研究,人們可以更好地評估一家公司的未來表現。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Insteel Industries, Inc. (NYSE:IIIN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解真正控制Insteel Industries Inc.(NYSE:IIIN)的人,了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司的大部分股份,佔83%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$50m last week. However, the 10% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

上週公司市值下跌5,000,000美元,機構投資者承受了最高的損失。但是,一年期股東收益率10%可能已經緩解了衝擊。但他們可能會警惕未來的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Insteel Industries.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東告訴我們有關Insteel Industries的信息。

big
NYSE:IIIN Ownership Breakdown August 3rd 2024
紐交所:IIIN股權結構分佈於2024年8月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Insteel Industries?

機構所有權對Insteel Industries告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Insteel Industries does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Insteel Industries' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Insteel Industries確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的相當大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出與其他人一樣的糟糕投資。如果多個機構同時改變其對股票的看法,則可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看一下Insteel Industries以下的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:IIIN Earnings and Revenue Growth August 3rd 2024
紐交所:IIIN盈利和營收增長於2024年8月3日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Insteel Industries is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Howard Woltz directly holds 2.6% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重大的權力。Insteel Industries不是由對沖基金擁有的。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股份。爲了說明,第二大股東持有約6.5%的流通股份,第三大股東持有6.3%的股份。此外,該公司的首席執行官霍華德·沃爾茲直接持有總流通股本的2.6%。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了進一步的挖掘,並發現前9大股東持有該公司股份的51%左右,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Insteel Industries

Insteel Industries的內部股東所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Insteel Industries, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$26m worth of the US$643m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人持有Insteel Industries Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人共擁有價值2600萬美元的價值64,300萬美元的公司。看到內部人的一些投資是好的,但可能值得檢查那些內部人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管該公司擁有相當大的股權,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Insteel Industries you should know about.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。請考慮風險,例如。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Insteel Industries有1個警告信號,您應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論