share_log

Institutional Investors in Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZS) Lost 6.4% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZS) Lost 6.4% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

納斯達克股票代碼ZS的機構投資者上週虧損了6.4%,但已獲得長期增長的好處。
Simply Wall St ·  08/05 09:59

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Zscaler implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構擁有Zscaler的大量股份意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 共有6名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Zscaler, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZS) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 48% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看Zscaler, Inc. (納斯達克:ZS)的股東名冊可以幫助我們了解哪個群體最具影響力。擁有公司最多股份的群體——機構,佔據了公司約48%的股份,也就是說,如果股票走高,該群體將獲益最多(如果股票走低,將承受最大的損失)。

Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 6.4% last week. However, the 17% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

虧損是沒有股東願意承受的,尤其是機構投資者,他們看到自己的持股價值上週下跌了6.4%。但是,17%的一年回報肯定會減輕部分壓力。但是,我們會假設他們將會繼續關注未來的風險。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zscaler.

下圖展示了Zscaler的所有權不同群體的細節。

big
NasdaqGS:ZS Ownership Breakdown August 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:ZS的所有權細節,2024年8月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zscaler?

機構持股情況告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Zscaler does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zscaler's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Zscaler確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這支股票,並且喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在一種風險,即他們在“擁擠交易”中。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個買家可能會競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以查看下面的Zscaler歷史收益和營業收入,但是記住,故事並不僅故此而已。

big
NasdaqGS:ZS Earnings and Revenue Growth August 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:ZS的盈利和營業收入增長,2024年8月5日

Zscaler is not owned by hedge funds. Ajay Mangal is currently the company's largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 18% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Jagtar Chaudhry, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

Zscaler不是由對沖基金持有的。Ajay Mangal目前是該公司最大的股東,持有19%的流通股。要知道,第二大股東持有流通股約18%,第三大股東持有5.9%的股份。第二大股東也是首席執行官Jagtar Chaudhry。

We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Zscaler

Zscaler的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Zscaler, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$9.8b stake in this US$26b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最近的數據表明內部股東擁有Zscaler, Inc.合理的一部分股份。非常有趣的是,內部人士在這個價值約260億美元的企業中擁有一項有意義的98億美元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會也在投資。你可能希望進入這個免費的圖表,顯示內部人士最近的交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zscaler. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通過持有14%的股份,佔據主要地位的是一般公衆,大多數是個人投資者,他們對Zscaler具有一定的影響力。儘管這個群體不能直接決定,但確實對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Zscaler has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我發現看一個公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣,但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。比如風險——Zscaler有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論