share_log

Yalla Group Limited (NYSE:YALA) CEO Tao Yang's Holdings Dropped 11% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

Yalla Group Limited (NYSE:YALA) CEO Tao Yang's Holdings Dropped 11% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

雅樂科技集團有限公司(紐交所:YALA)執行長Tao Yang的持股因近期回調下跌了11%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/06 10:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Yalla Group's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • The top 2 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 雅樂科技重要內部持股表明公司擴張具有內在動力
  • 前2大股東擁有該公司的55%股份。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Yalla Group Limited (NYSE:YALA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

了解Yalla Group Limited (紐交所:YALA)的控制者真正是誰,關鍵在於理解該公司的所有權結構。持有該公司最多股份的一組股東,確切地說大約佔公司股份總數的43%,是個人內部持股人。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將從中受益最多(或者如果出現下行趨勢,將遭受最大損失)。

And following last week's 11% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

在股價上週下跌了11%後,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Yalla Group.

讓我們更深入地了解不同類型的股東能爲我們提供關於雅樂科技的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:YALA Ownership Breakdown August 6th 2024
紐交所:YALA所有權分佈(截至2024年8月6日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yalla Group?

機構持股對雅樂科技的意義是什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Yalla Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Yalla Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,雅樂科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們看好它。但像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總是存在他們正在湧入的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下方看到雅樂科技的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜。

big
NYSE:YALA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 6th 2024
紐交所:YALA收益和營業收入增長(截至2024年8月6日)

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Yalla Group. The company's CEO Tao Yang is the largest shareholder with 38% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

對於雅樂科技而言,對沖基金持有的股份不多。公司CEO Tao Yang持有該公司38%的流通股,爲最大的股東。作爲背景,第二大股東持有大約17%的流通股,第三大股東則持有5.7%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Yalla Group

雅樂科技的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Yalla Group Limited. Insiders own US$272m worth of shares in the US$632m company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部持股人在雅樂科技有相當比例的股份。內部持有這家市值6320萬美元的公司的股份價值2720萬美元。這可能意味着創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

看到誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,總是存在的投資風險。我們已經確認深圳歐陸通存在1個警告信號,了解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 23%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

擁有23%的所有權,私人股權公司有能力在以創造價值爲重點的公司戰略中發揮一定作用。有時候我們會看到私人股權公司長期保持持股,但總的來說,他們的投資時間更短,而且如名稱所示,不會投資於上市公司。一段時間之後,他們可能會尋求出售並重新配置資金。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Yalla Group better, we need to consider many other factors.

了解公司所有股東的不同群體始終是值得考慮的問題。但要更好地了解雅樂科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論