share_log

Disappointing Week for WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Institutional Investors Who Control 81% of the Company

Disappointing Week for WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG) Institutional Investors Who Control 81% of the Company

紐交所肯瑞糖有限公司(Wk Kellogg Co)的機構投資者度過了令人失望的一週,他們控制着該公司的81%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/07 09:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in WK Kellogg Co implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在Wk Kellogg Co中擁有大量股份,這意味着它們對該公司的股價具有重大影響力。
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of WK Kellogg Co (NYSE:KLG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解Wk Kellogg Co(NYSE:KLG)真正掌控公司的人,了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。最持有該公司股份的組別是機構,佔81%的所有權。換句話說,該組別有可能從其對該公司的投資中獲得最多(或最少)。

And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 8.1%.

上週,機構遭受的最大損失是股票下跌了8.1%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of WK Kellogg Co, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Wk Kellogg Co的每一種業主類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:KLG Ownership Breakdown August 7th 2024
NYSE:KLG所有權分佈圖2024年8月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About WK Kellogg Co?

機構所有權對Wk Kellogg Co有什麼影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

WK Kellogg Co already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at WK Kellogg Co's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Wk Kellogg Co已經有機構投資者佔股。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂確認。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價的迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Wk Kellogg Co下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:KLG Earnings and Revenue Growth August 7th 2024
NYSE:KLG盈利和營業收入增長2024年8月7日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in WK Kellogg Co. Our data shows that W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Endowment Fund is the largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. With 9.7% and 6.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股份,董事會可能會關注他們的偏好。對於Wk Kellogg Co,對沖基金擁有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,W.k. Kellogg基金會,捐贈基金是最大的股東,持有16%的優先股。The Vanguard Group, Inc.以9.7%和6.2%的優先股分別是第二大和第三大股東。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們發現其中 50% 的所有權受前11位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握所有權益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of WK Kellogg Co

Wk Kellogg Co內部股權擁有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in WK Kellogg Co. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$18m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Wk Kellogg Co的某些股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要股東持股水平相當高是一個積極的信號。在這種情況下,他們持有約1800萬美元的股票(以當前價格計算)。看到內部人員這樣的投資水平是很好的。您可以在此處檢查他們最近是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over WK Kellogg Co. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有18%所有權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Wk Kellogg Co具有一定的影響力。雖然擁有這樣的所有權很大,但如果這個決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand WK Kellogg Co better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with WK Kellogg Co , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考慮到持股人的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解Wk Kellogg Co,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了Wk Kellogg Co的3個警告信號,並且了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論