share_log

Is Newmont (NYSE:NEM) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Newmont (NYSE:NEM) Using Too Much Debt?

紐曼礦業(紐交所:NEM)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 06:53

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

當David Iben說「波動性並不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。」時,他說得很好。當我們考慮一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡看看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務超載可能會導致破產。我們可以看到,紐曼礦業業務中確實使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務創造了多少風險?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

通常情況下,只有當公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,即無法通過籌集資金或利用自有現金流進行償還時,債務才會成爲一個真正的問題。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所有。然而,一種更常見(但仍然痛苦的)情況是它不得不以低價募集新的股本資本,從而永久稀釋股東的股份。當然,在企業中,債務可以是一個重要的工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。當我們審查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平,一起考慮。

How Much Debt Does Newmont Carry?

紐曼礦業負債有多重?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Newmont had debt of US$8.69b, up from US$5.57b in one year. However, it also had US$2.65b in cash, and so its net debt is US$6.04b.

以下的圖表可以點擊查看更詳細的數據,顯示在2024年6月,紐曼礦業公司負債總額爲86.9億美元,而一年前的負債總額爲55.7億美元。然而,公司持有現金達26.5億美元,因此淨負債爲60.4億美元。

big
NYSE:NEM Debt to Equity History August 8th 2024
紐交所紐曼礦業股票的負債股權歷史記錄於2024年8月8日。

How Strong Is Newmont's Balance Sheet?

紐曼的資產負債表究竟有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Newmont had liabilities of US$5.73b due within a year, and liabilities of US$20.4b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$2.65b as well as receivables valued at US$955.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$22.5b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,紐曼礦業公司短期債務爲57.3億美元,長期債務爲204億美元。公司的現金爲26.5億美元,應收賬款在12個月以內價值95500萬美元。因此,公司的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多了225億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because Newmont is worth a massive US$54.8b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

這個赤字並不糟糕,因爲紐曼的市值高達548億美元,因此如果需要,在必要時可以籌集足夠的資本來支撐它的資產負債表。但很明顯,我們肯定要仔細研究它是否能夠管理其資產負債表而不必稀釋股權。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

Newmont's net debt is only 1.3 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 12.1 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. In addition to that, we're happy to report that Newmont has boosted its EBIT by 85%, thus reducing the spectre of future debt repayments. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Newmont can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

紐曼的淨債務僅爲其稅前息稅折舊和攤銷的1.3倍。而它的息稅前利潤盈餘涵蓋了其利息支出高達12.1倍。因此,我們對其極度保守的債務使用非常放心。此外,我們很高興地報道,紐曼將其利潤盈餘涵蓋率提高了85%,從而降低了未來債務償還的隱患。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的起點。但歸根結底,企業未來的盈利能力將決定紐曼能否穩固其資產負債表。因此,如果你專注於未來,可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的盈利預測。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Newmont recorded free cash flow worth 72% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

最後,一家企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤無法解決問題。因此,值得檢查的是有多少EBIt由自由現金流支持。在最近的三年中,紐曼礦業公司錄得的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIt的72%,這是很正常的,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅收。這種自由現金流使公司在適當時繳納債務處於有利地位。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Newmont's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think Newmont's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Newmont (of which 1 is potentially serious!) you should know about.

令人高興的是,紐曼礦業公司的利息覆蓋率強烈暗示其在債務方面佔優。好消息並沒有在那裏停止,因爲其EBIt增長率也支持這一印象!全面審視後,我們認爲紐曼礦業公司對於債務的使用似乎相當合理,我們並不爲此擔心。雖然債務確實帶來風險,但明智使用時也可以帶來更高的股本回報。毫無疑問,我們可以從資產負債表中學到債務的大部分內容。但歸根結底,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險很難被發現。每個公司都會有這些風險,我們已經發現了紐曼礦業公司的 2個預警信號(其中1個可能嚴重),你應該了解這些風險。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論