share_log

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) May Not Be Profitable But It Seems To Be Managing Its Debt Just Fine, Anyway

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) May Not Be Profitable But It Seems To Be Managing Its Debt Just Fine, Anyway

Blink Charging(納斯達克:BLNK)可能不盈利,但無論如何似乎在很好地管理其債務。
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 07:14

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Blink Charging Co. (NASDAQ:BLNK) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

David Iben說得很好,「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。」 當你考慮一個公司是否有風險時,考慮其資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業破產時往往涉及債務。與許多其他公司一樣,Blink Charging Co.(NASDAQ:BLNK)使用債務。但更重要的問題是:那些債務製造了多大的風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

當公司不能輕鬆地滿足債務或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金時,債務和其他負債對其構成風險。資本主義的組成部分是創造性破壞的過程,失敗的企業經常被債權人無情地清算。雖然這並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因出借人以低廉的價格強迫其發行股票而不得不不斷稀釋股東利益。當然,許多公司使用債務來資助其增長,沒有產生任何負面後果。考慮公司債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務一起考慮。

What Is Blink Charging's Debt?

什麼是Blink Charging的債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Blink Charging had US$6.79m of debt, an increase on US$10.0k, over one year. However, its balance sheet shows it holds US$93.5m in cash, so it actually has US$86.7m net cash.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但從2024年3月起,Blink Charging擁有679萬美元的債務,比一年前增加了1萬美元。 然而,其資產負債表顯示,它持有9350萬美元的現金,因此實際上有8670萬美元的淨現金。

big
NasdaqCM:BLNK Debt to Equity History August 8th 2024
NasdaqCM:BLNk股本負債歷史 2024年8月8日

How Strong Is Blink Charging's Balance Sheet?

Blink Charging的資產負債表有多強?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Blink Charging had liabilities of US$67.2m due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$40.5m due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$93.5m and US$53.6m worth of receivables due within a year. So it actually has US$39.3m more liquid assets than total liabilities.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,Blink Charging有6720萬美元的負債到期,逾期12個月的負債爲4050萬美元。另一方面,它擁有9350萬美元現金和價值5360萬美元的應收賬款到期。因此,它實際上比總負債多3930萬美元的流動資產。這種剩餘表明Blink Charging具有保守的資產負債表,很可能毫不費力地消除其債務。簡言之,Blink Charging擁有淨現金,因此可以說它沒有沉重的債務負擔!毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得有關債務的大部分信息。但最終,業務未來的盈利能力將決定Blink Charging能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。

This surplus suggests that Blink Charging has a conservative balance sheet, and could probably eliminate its debt without much difficulty. Succinctly put, Blink Charging boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Blink Charging can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

在過去的一年中,Blink Charging EBIt水平上並沒有盈利,但其營業收入增長了114%,達到了1.56億美元。因此,股東們明顯希望獲得更多的增長!

In the last year Blink Charging wasn't profitable at an EBIT level, but managed to grow its revenue by 114%, to US$156m. So its pretty obvious shareholders are hoping for more growth!

因其固有特性,虧損的公司相對於具有長期盈利歷史的公司更具有風險性。事實上,在過去的十二個月中,Blink Charging在利息和稅前收益(EBIT)線上虧損。同時,它在同一時期內看到了1.04億美元的負自由現金流出,並計入了1.91億美元的會計損失。鑑於該公司只有淨現金8670萬美元,如果它沒有很快實現盈虧平衡,可能需要籌集更多資本。重要的是,Blink Charging的營業收入增長勢頭強勁。高增長的無盈利公司可能會很有風險,但它們也可以提供巨大的回報。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。但並非所有的投資風險都駐留在資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。這些風險很難被發現。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了Blink Charging的3個警告標誌(其中1個非常重要!)你應該知道。

So How Risky Is Blink Charging?

Blink Charging的風險如何?

By their very nature companies that are losing money are more risky than those with a long history of profitability. And the fact is that over the last twelve months Blink Charging lost money at the earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) line. And over the same period it saw negative free cash outflow of US$104m and booked a US$191m accounting loss. Given it only has net cash of US$86.7m, the company may need to raise more capital if it doesn't reach break-even soon. Importantly, Blink Charging's revenue growth is hot to trot. High growth pre-profit companies may well be risky, but they can also offer great rewards. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Blink Charging (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.

由於本質原因,虧損的公司比具有長期盈利歷史的公司更具有風險性。事實是,過去12個月中,Blink Charging在利息和稅前收益(EBIT)線上虧損。在同一時期內,它看到了1.04億美元的負自由現金流出,並計入了1.91億美元的會計損失。 鑑於該公司只有淨現金8670萬美元,如果它沒有很快實現盈虧平衡,可能需要籌集更多資本。重要的是,Blink Charging的營業收入增長勢頭強勁。 高增長的無盈利公司可能會很有風險,但它們還可以提供巨大的回報。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是一個明顯的起點。但並非所有的投資風險都駐留在資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。這些風險很難被發現。每個公司都有它們,我們已經發現了Blink Charging的3個警告標誌(其中1個非常重要!)你應該知道。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論