Yanlord Land Group Limited's (SGX:Z25) Largest Shareholder, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop
Yanlord Land Group Limited's (SGX:Z25) Largest Shareholder, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong Sees Holdings Value Fall by 7.6% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant insider control over Yanlord Land Group implies vested interests in company growth
- Sheng Jian Zhong owns 72% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 仁恒置地集團內部人員對公司增長的控制意味着利益相關。
- 盛堅忠擁有該公司的72%股權。
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
If you want to know who really controls Yanlord Land Group Limited (SGX:Z25), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 74% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果您想知道誰真正控制了仁恒置地集團有限公司(新加坡交易所:Z25),那麼您需要查看其股票登記冊的構成。持股比例最大的是個人內部人員,持有74%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,則該群體將獲得最大的利益(或如果出現衰退將蒙受最大的損失)。
As market cap fell to S$821m last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由於市值上週降至8,210萬新元,內部人員將面臨公司股東中最高的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Yanlord Land Group, beginning with the chart below.
接下來,讓我們深入了解仁恒置地集團的每種股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Yanlord Land Group?
機構對仁恒置地集團告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Yanlord Land Group. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
機構在仁恒置地集團中的持股很少。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不受專業投資者特別青睞。如果該公司從這裏開始變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多的機構希望購買。有時,當一些大型機構同時想要購買某隻股票時,我們會看到股票價格上漲。您可以在下面看到的營收和收入歷史記錄可能有所幫助,考慮是否更多機構投資者會想要該股票。當然,還有其他許多因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Yanlord Land Group. With a 72% stake, CEO Sheng Jian Zhong is the largest shareholder. With such a huge stake, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. It's usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider with such skin in the game. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.6% and 1.5% of the stock.
對於仁恒置地集團,對沖基金股份不多。擁有72%股份的首席執行官盛堅忠是最大的股東。由於持有如此巨大的股權,我們可以推斷他們對公司未來有重要的控制力。當內部人員擁有公司中大量的股份時,這通常被視爲一個良好的跡象,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到一位公司內部人員具有這樣的投入。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有的股票約爲1.6%和1.5%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Yanlord Land Group
仁恒置地集團的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Yanlord Land Group Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own S$605m worth of shares in the S$821m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人員擁有仁恒置地集團有限公司的股份超過一半。這使他們有效地控制公司。這意味着他們擁有8,210萬新元的股份。這是相當有意義的投資。您可以在此處檢查內部人員最近是否購買過這些股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的23%股權,因此他們不容易被忽視。儘管該群體不能一呼百應,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Yanlord Land Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Yanlord Land Group you should know about.
在考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體之前,總是值得思考。但要更好地了解仁恒置地集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮風險,例如。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現仁恒置地集團的1個警告信號,您應該了解。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。